Question: Exercise 2: (5 marks) Two independent methods of forecasting based on judgment and experience have been prepared each month for the past four months. The
Exercise 2: (5 marks)
Two independent methods of forecasting based on judgment and experience have been prepared each month for the past four months. The forecasts and the actual sales are as follows:
| Month | Sales | Forecast 1 | Forecast 2 | Error Forecast 1 | Error Forecast 2 |
| 1 | 779 | 775 | 773 | 4 | 6 |
| 2 | 785 | 783 | 787 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 791 | 790 | 793 | 1 | 2 |
| 4 | 795 | 793 | 794 | 2 | 1 |
| 5 | 799 | 790 | 795 | 9 | 4 |
| 6 | 812 | 791 | 798 | 21 | 14 |
| 7 | 815 | 791 | 810 | 24 | 5 |
| 8 |
| 791 | 814 |
|
|
| MAD Calculation |
|
|
| 9.0 | 4.8 |
- Forecast month No 5 in forecast-1, by using a weighted average forecast with weights .5 for the previous month, 0.3 for the month before that, and 0.2 for the last month
- Forecast month No 5 for forecast-2, by using exponential smoothing with =0.85
- Given the sales of months 5, 6, 7 to be (799, 812, and 815) compute the above forecasts with the same models (weighted average for F-1 and exponential smoothing for F-2), and then calculate MAD and decide which technique is superior.
MAD Forecast 1: 9
MAD Forecast 2: 4.85
Technique Forecast 2 is superior.
Hint: Dont forget to calculate month (8)
Question: up to which month will you calculate MAD?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
