explain the six values from the Oregon Project.

efficacy in relation to the six values embraced by the citizen participants. Below treatment 567, no other services would be covered (transplants were to be covered). Although the full list of covered services exceeded federal Medicaid mandates, it was incomplete. The public outcryin this case, mostly from outside the statewas intense. The administration of Pres. George W. Bush denied the waivers necessary to allow the experiment to proceed. Oregon's political experiment was participatory and largely consensual. It was values driven and balanced. It yielded a generous list of benefits for an expanded number of Medicaid recipients. Yet it failed for at least two reasons. First, it was more an exercise in intellectual solidarity than social solidarity. The citizen participants and the state legislators were naming public Learning reading speed 81% values and drafting services lists that, for the most part, they did not have to live under themselves. Thus their com- mitment to extend meaningful health care to more low-income residents was morally strong but socially distant. Sec- ond, Americans remain deeply resistant to public mechanisms for setting health care priorities and implementing limits. Every scientific panel that recommends against current medical practice-for example, cutting back on screenings for breast cancer and prostate cancer-is met with vehement criticism. Even the Medicare Independent Payment Advis- ory Board established by the ACA is re- sisted by Democrats who voted for the law.? The American political culture of personal liberty makes it unlikely that better health care value for the money will be achieved by means of the public allocation approach used in Oregon. Learning reading speed 81%