explain this using simple words

There are a few factors you might add to deepen the picture. From Fatoyinbo (2025), it could help to name what real recognition looks like: jurisdiction, consent, and enforcement by Indigenous nations. Concrete examplessuch as references to UNDRIP and free, prior, and informed consent, or recent conflicts over land and waterwould show how recognition works in practice. Bringing in Razack, Richardson, and Pillay (2025) could also extend your point: they show how the \"violence of curriculum' in medical education reproduces colonial norms that then affect clinical decisions and health outcomes. Including that institutional lens would connect governance, daily services, and people's well-being. You might also name intersectional factorshow gender, class, and rural/urban location shape risks for Indigenous women and girlsin addition to the colonial legal framework. Your response suggests a strong critical race and Indigenous feminist leaning: you highlight power, colonial knowledge, and gendered violence, and you call for decolonization rather than symbolic reconciliation. | share that lens. If | approached it differently, | would add a social determinants perspective alongside it, not to replace power analysis, but to show mechanisms: how the denial of Indigenous jurisdiction translates into housing displacement, clinic access barriers, and policing practices. | would also trace the \"hidden curriculum\" that Razack et al. describehow case studies, jokes, and assessment rubrics teach students whose laws and lives matter. Together, these lenses support your conclusion: real change means shifting authority to Indigenous legal orders and resourcing Indigenous-led safety, healing, and sovereignty