Find L'Heureux-Dub's reasoning (starting at paragraph 98) persuasive in Gosselin v. Qubec (Attorney General), but the court

Find L'Heureux-Dubé's reasoning (starting at paragraph 98) persuasive in Gosselin v. Québec (Attorney General), but the court disagreed. I leave you to your own conclusions. Are young people unduly discriminated against? Does the court adequately understand the dignity of young people - after all, there are no judges on the SCC under 50. Does the fact that the law intended to make young people more employable help?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

In Gosselin v Qubec Attorney General Justice LHeureuxDubs reasoning starting at paragraph 98 focused ... View the full answer