For each question below answer either True or False. Simply respond to this questions with true/false answers.

1. An argument consists of a set of premises and a conclusion where the conclusion functions as a reason for thinking that the premises are true.

2. If a person automatically accepts the conclusion of an argument, that person is said to be a relativist.

3. If a person automatically asserts the opposite of the conclusion of an argument, that person is said to be credulous.

4. If a person says that all arguments are equally strong and that no argument is stronger than any other argument, that person is said to be dogmatic.

5. It is possible for two different sentence-tokens of the same sentence type to express one and the same proposition.

6. It is possible for two different sentence-tokens of different sentence-types to express one and the same proposition.

7. Different sentence-tokens of the same sentence-type never express different propositions. '

8. Different sentence-tokens of different sentence-types never express different propositions.

9. Different sentence-tokens of the same sentence-type always express one and the same proposition.

10. Different sentence-tokens of different sentence-types always express one and the same proposition.

11. It is possible for one and the same proposition to bear more than one truth-value.

12. Every proposition bears exactly two truth-values the value true and the value false.

13. If Jones believes that hell get the job but doesnt get the job, that means that Jones belief that hell get the job was irrational.

14. Since Jones total evidence for his belief that hell get the job supports his belief, Jones belief cannot be irrational.

15. Even though Jones and Smith disagree about Donald Trumps age, Jones and Smith can each still be rational about Donald Trumps age.

16. Since Jones and Harry both believe that the universe is more than 200 years old, it must be the case that they are both rational in their belief that the earth is more than 200 years old.

17. If Jones believes p at a time t1 (because his evidence supports p), but comes to believe at some later time t2 that p is false (because his evidence at t2 goes against p), then Joes earlier belief at t1 must be irrational.

18. It is impossible to have more than one propositional attitude towards a proposition at the same time.

19. Suppose that Jones evidence supports p, but just barely. Since this is so, Jones should suspend judgment with respect to p.

20. The degree of belief that you have for a proposition cannot change over time.