General Equivalence Mappings $($GEMS$)$ is a system that provides a way to translate between two different code sets in the medical field. These code sets can include various types of medical classifications, such as diagnosis codes $($ICD$-9-$CM and ICD$-10-$CM$)$ or procedure codes $($ICD$-9-$PCS and ICD$-10-$PCS$).$ GEMS was developed to assist with the transition from one coding system to another by creating mappings between the two code sets. The primary purpose of GEMS is to facilitate the translation of data from one coding system to another, ensuring that information can be accurately converted without losing important details. However, it's important to note that GEMS does not account for specific patient encounter information or contextual details. It simply provides a rough mapping between codes in different code sets, based on their similarities and closest equivalents. Healthcare professionals and organizations often use GEMS during the transition period when implementing a new coding system, such as the switch from ICD$-9$ to ICD$-10.$ By using GEMS, they can better understand how specific codes in the older system correspond to codes in the new system. This can help ensure a smooth transition and minimize errors or discrepancies in data interpretation and analysis. While GEMS can be a valuable tool during the transition between different coding systems, it's essential for healthcare professionals to use it alongside their clinical judgment and expertise. GEMS should not be relied upon as the sole method for translating codes, especially when specific patient details or contextual information are crucial for accurate coding and billing. GEMS provides a linkage between a code in one set to its closest equivalent in the other code set without consideration of context or specific patient encounter information.

Explain how GEMS can help a user$/$coder$.$ Is GEMS a good alternative to use instead of current code sets?