Given the below sensitivity analysis table for a cost minimization

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS TABLE

$\backslash$table$[[$Variable$,$Solution,Original Value,$\backslash$table$[[$Lower$],[$Bound$]],\backslash$table$[[$Upper$],[$Bound$]]],[,25\mathrm{.}71,,1,0\mathrm{.}67,3],[x2,21\mathrm{.}43,,2,0\mathrm{.}67,3],[$Constraints$,$Dual Price,$\backslash$table$[[$Slack $/],[$Surplus$]],\backslash$table$[[$Original$],[$Value$]],\backslash$table$[[$Lower$],[$Bound$]],\backslash$table$[[$Upper$],[$Bound$]]],[$Constraint $1,-0\mathrm{.}57,0,90,40,152],[$Constraint $2,0,88\mathrm{.}57,160,-$Infinity,$248\mathrm{.}57],[$Constraint $3,-0\mathrm{.}14,0,120,91\mathrm{.}82,270],[$Constraint $4,0,48\mathrm{.}57,70,21\mathrm{.}43,$Infinity$]]$

The most appropriate conclusion we can come to about Constraint $2$ is that it is a$..$

A$.$ resource constraint

B$.$ nonbinding constraint

C$.$ binding constraint

D$.$ nonlinear constraint