Question: Hurdlevack Ltd relies on the payback method of project evaluation, requiring that investments repay capital within three years. The board are currently considering the four

Hurdlevack Ltd relies on the payback method of project evaluation, requiring that investments repay capital within three years. The board are currently considering the four projects listed below: (ignore tax)

Project

A

B

C

D

$

$

$

$

Sales

40,000

75,000

60,000

60,000

Direct costs

16,000

27,000

15,000

18,000

Depreciation

8,000

40,000

30,000

35,000

Interest

12,000

16,000

9,000

7,000

Initial investment

120,000

160,000

90,000

70,000

Project life (years)

10

10

18

15

The engineering department has requested the board to evaluate these opportunities by means of a discounted cash flow technique. The finance department personnel have been unwilling to use a discounted cash flow technique because of difficulty in establishing an appropriate discount rate. They therefore propose to calculate each project's internal rate of return and let the board determine appropriate hurdle rates.

Payback Period

Project A: 10 years

Project B: 5 years

Project C: 2.6 years

Project D: 2 years

Internal Rate of Return

Project A: Nill

Project B: 15.1%

Project C: 39.9%

Project D: 49.90%

(a) Discuss the possible reasons why the above two project appraisal methods (Payback Period and IRR) do not give answers which are consistent with each other, for the accept/reject decision. Which should the board employ? Why?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Accounting Questions!