Question: I need help developing an argumentive essay explaining the main arguments for and against interpreting anticipatory self-defence as legal under international law. Which position (that
I need help developing an argumentive essay explaining the main arguments for and against interpreting anticipatory self-defence as legal under international law. Which position (that anticipatory self-defence is legal or illegal) is most convincing? Why? Use a minimum of 3 of the following required sources
- W.M. Reisman, "Editorial Comment: Assessing Claims to Revise the Laws of War," (2003) 96 AJIL 82.
- Michael N. Schmitt, "The Law of Cyber Warfare: Quo Vadis?" (2014) 25 Stanford Law & Policy Review 269.
- Terry D. Gill and Paul A. L. Ducheine, "Anticipatory Self-Defense in the Cyber Context," 89 (2013) Int'l L. Stud. 438.
- Antonio Cassese, "Terrorism Is Also Disrupting Some Crucial Legal Categories of International Law," 12 European Journal of International Law 993 (2001).
- M.J. Glennon, "The Fog of Law: Self Defense, Inherence and Incoherence in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter," 25 Harvard J. L. and Pub. Policy 539 (2002).
- Oscar Schachter, Self-defense and the Rule of Law, 83 AJIL 29 (1989).
Relevant assigned materials:
Charter of the United Nations
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
