Question: I need help developing an argumentive essay explaining the main arguments for and against interpreting anticipatory self-defence as legal under international law. Which position (that

I need help developing an argumentive essay explaining the main arguments for and against interpreting anticipatory self-defence as legal under international law. Which position (that anticipatory self-defence is legal or illegal) is most convincing? Why? Use a minimum of 3 of the following required sources

  • W.M. Reisman, "Editorial Comment: Assessing Claims to Revise the Laws of War," (2003) 96 AJIL 82.
  • Michael N. Schmitt, "The Law of Cyber Warfare: Quo Vadis?" (2014) 25 Stanford Law & Policy Review 269.
  • Terry D. Gill and Paul A. L. Ducheine, "Anticipatory Self-Defense in the Cyber Context," 89 (2013) Int'l L. Stud. 438.
  • Antonio Cassese, "Terrorism Is Also Disrupting Some Crucial Legal Categories of International Law," 12 European Journal of International Law 993 (2001).
  • M.J. Glennon, "The Fog of Law: Self Defense, Inherence and Incoherence in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter," 25 Harvard J. L. and Pub. Policy 539 (2002).
  • Oscar Schachter, Self-defense and the Rule of Law, 83 AJIL 29 (1989).

Relevant assigned materials:

Charter of the United Nations

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!