I need you to answer 3 discussion post questions from my peers and state whether you agree or disagree: (Business Ethics)

Post 1:Should this project be pursued?

I believe this project should be pursued because it will provide vulnerable individuals with additional protection.

How can it be done ethically?

The project should be communicated with the shelter and discussed whether or not there would be a secure way for the cameras to be set up. Speaking with a human rights lawyer would also answer questions about privacy laws and public areas. Since the individuals involved are placed in the shelter for protection and privacy it is imperative that the project follow all local guidelines and regulations.

What Unique ethical concerns does it raise?

There would be issues that the footage may become compromised and since the technology would be used to identify authorized individuals, it would mean their information would have to be collected and stored into the program. This is a concern since those using the shelter are there seeking asylum from a dangerous situation and wish for anonymity.

What additional fact might be required?

Those involved would need to be trustworthy and abided by the strict confidentiality agreement. Running background checks on those operating the system may need to be done in order to reduce any risk to those using the shelter.

What practical steps might be taken to access the information needed to manage the ethical landscape of this project?

Gather all relevant information about the project, speak with legal representatives to make sure the project does not violate any local laws and request a meeting with the head of the shelter.

What are some ethical considerations that any designer/developers would need to consider?

Since the personal information is being stored into a database, the developers will need to make sure that there is highly secure firewall to protect people from identity theft.

How would I go about sorting through these ethical considerations?

The team could be sorted into different divisions that would be responsible for researching the potential issues that could arise and solutions to those problems.

Which ethical issues would I prioritize?

The issue concerning privacy would be the top priority for the team to focus on. If there were any leaks of information it could be detrimental to the safety of the individuals residing in the shelter.

Post 2There are many moral questions to be answered before moving forward with the plan to create a face recognition program for domestic abuse shelters. Some things to think about are as follows:

• Obtaining informed permission from the people whose faces will be taken and analyzed is a major ethical problem because of the potential invasion of their privacy. Guests in shelters may have real worries about being recognized by intrusive technology, and shelters have a responsibility to put their safety and privacy first. Mechanisms for providing clear information and gaining agreement would be essential.
• Facial recognition technologies have been demonstrated to be biased and discriminatory, particularly against vulnerable populations. People from many walks of life, of all racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic origins, seek refuge in shelters. Combating and reducing prejudice is essential for avoiding harmful discriminatory effects.
• Safety and protection: boosting security in shelters is crucial, but it's also vital to find a happy medium that doesn't put visitors' well-being at risk. To safeguard against abuse, the technology should be built to prevent its own misuse or illegal access to private information.

The following are some concrete actions that might be performed to better manage the ethical landscape of this project:

• Involve key players: talk to those who will be affected by this decision, such shelter workers, residents, domestic violence specialists, and privacy activists. Find out what they want, need, and think about the technology.
• Make use of privacy impact analyses: Analyze how the technology might compromise users' security and privacy. Verify that all steps taken with face data are in accordance with current privacy requirements by evaluating how it is gathered, stored, and used.
• Put in place anti-discrimination measures: When developing face recognition systems, it is important to invest in training data that is both varied and representative. Perform regular testing and audits to ensure a fair system and correct any biases that may occur.
• Create definite rules and regulations: Set up rules for how the system's data may be used, stored, and shared. Spread the word to your employees, visitors, and anyone else who could be affected by these rules.
• Continuous monitoring of the system's performance and effect, together with periodic audits to detect emerging ethical problems, is essential. Be receptive to criticism and quick to make corrections.

Designers and developers also need to think about the following moral concerns:

• Data deletion and retention policies should be established, including a time frame for how long face recognition data should be kept before being deleted.
• Precision and dependability in the system: Ensure a high degree of accuracy and reliability in the face recognition system to reduce the likelihood of mistakes being made in the identifying process.
• Engage the local community and advocacy organizations in project talks by asking for and responding to their feedback and concerns. Encourage candid communication and openness to feedback at all stages of planning and execution.

For a project team to make sense of these moral dilemmas, they'd have to do extensive study, talk to experts, include stakeholders, and keep assessing the technology's effects and hazards. Since the people in shelters are often in a vulnerable state, it is difficult to generalize about the relevance of ethical factors like consent, prejudice reduction, and privacy protection.

Post 3:Facial recognition is a growing trend in many areas of security, from retail to home protection. Considering this application for a shelter is an interesting approach, and we can dissect the pros and cons here. First, I do think that implementation of facial recognition software could benefit these types or organizations. By having the ability to more efficiently screen entrants and guests, it can reduce the likelihood of unwanted guests entering the facility. It can also reduce wait times and staff's time needed to get people signed in and registered (Orgcode.com, 2023) On the other hand, we are talking about the most vulnerable members of our community, and collecting data about them and their comings and goings may feel like an invasion of privacy in the exact space they are looking for shelter and safety. I think that as a developer of this software, there are a lot of things to consider. For example, facial recognition may not always recognize someone who has been abused or is showing visible injury on their face. This could be detrimental to someone experiencing domestic abuse to not be "recognizable". Not to mention, individuals in those domestic abuse situations may not want to press charges or have documented evidence of their injuries or even photos of their face taken or have their attendance at a women's shelter documented. With facial recognition it takes some of the autonomy and safety out of the shelter experience.