In Prestenbach v. Collins, the State Supreme Court held that a. Prestenbach was entitled to pursue his
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
In Prestenbach v. Collins, the State Supreme Court held that
a. Prestenbach was entitled to pursue his claim for specific performance against Collins given that he timely exercised his option to purchase the real estate at issue.
b. None of the above.
c. Prestenbach was not entitled to pursue performance from Collins since he was not able to complete the purchase of the property at the time he executed his option to purchase the real estate from Collins.
d. Prestenbach was entitled to an injunction award since his option contract with Collins afforded him a right of first refusal to purchase the real estate at issue.
e. Collins was entitled to cancel the option contract given Prestenbach's inability to perform as promised.
Expert Answer:
Answera Prestenbach was entitled to pursue his claim for specific performance against ... View the full answer
Posted Date:
