In the Lucy case, the defendant argued: The plaintiff was too intoxicated to contract He was joking
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
In the Lucy case, the defendant argued:
The plaintiff was too intoxicated to contract
He was joking and lacked the intent to contract
There was no evidence of a contract
The contract was burdensome
Expert Answer:
The question seems to be asking about the defenses used by the defendant in the famous US case Lucy v Zehmer 1962 which is a landmark case in contract ... View the full answer
Related Book For 
Posted Date:
