is the answer A, C, or D

Macau Manufacturing contracted with Southern Digital to develop a computer system for its newest manufacturing facility. Two years later, an information technology consultant for Macau Manufacturing discovered that one of the server's two hard drives in the computer system was not functioning properly. Macau Manufacturing told Southern Digital about the problem and took the server to Southern Digital to be repaired under the previously agreed upon warranty. In attempting to copy the data from the remaining working hard drive, a specialist at Southern Digital accidentally erased all of the data. The specialist did not back up the mirrored drive because he was not asked to do so and the industry standard is to not to back up client unless specifically requested. As a result of the erasure, Macau Manufacturing lost all of its technical and sales data. Macau Manufacturing sued Southern Digital for Negligence. What result would the court likely find? a. A bailment was not created because the possession of the computer system b. A bailment was created between the bailee and bailor, and Southern Digital was strictly liable for and direct or indirect harm imposed on the server during the period Southern Digital was in possession. c. A bailment was created for the mutual benefit of the bailee and bailor, and Southern Digital failed to use ordinary care and was thus negligent in maintaining the property of Macau Manufacturing. d. A bailment was created, but Southern Digital did not breach any duty because it acted according to industry standards in not backing up the hard drive