Question: It is oftentimes argued that plea bargaining is necessary because it quickly disposes of caseswithout it, the criminal justice system would be unable to function

It is oftentimes argued that plea bargaining is necessary because it quickly disposes of cases—without it, the criminal justice system would be unable to function because it would become overwhelmed. Yet, Walker (1993) provides evidence to the contrary. In places where plea bargaining was abolished no such result occurred. With this in mind, and considering all that you read in both Walker (1993) and Gottfredson and Gottfredson (1988), do you believe that we should have a system of plea bargaining in this country? Why or why not? Does the decline in the conviction rate that Walker (1993) discusses concern you in any way, or is this something that we should not be concerned about?

Step by Step Solution

3.47 Rating (150 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

The debate surrounding plea bargaining has been ongoing for years with proponents arguing that it helps to efficiently dispose of cases and prevent court congestion while opponents argue that it can l... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!