Kambiz, an 34 year old engineer, worked for a construction company for four years when he was terminated without cause. The amount of pay he received was strictly following the Employment Standards Code. The employer stated that it did not owe him any more pay in lieu under the common law because, according to the employment contract's termination clause, it only had to meet the minimum requirements of the provincial employment standards statute. The contract termination clause read: Termination notice must be in writing from the Manager, and professional staff will receive one month's notice...and/or as established by legislation. Kambiz is confused. Help him by answering the questions below: (1) What are Kambiz's arguments that the termination clause is invalid? (5 points) (2) If Kambiz sues for wrongful dismissal, how will the courts determine the common law reasonable notice? (2 points)