Kuperman describes the effect of the 1948 Genocide Convention and the Responsibility to Protect as "eroding the norm of sovereignty." In contrast, proponents of the Responsibility to Protect would describe this effect as redefining sovereignty.

Which do you think is the better way to characterize this development? Why?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

While both eroding and redefining describe the impact of the 1948 Genocide Convention and the Responsibility to Protect on the concept of sovereignty ... View the full answer