Mailings 2 WE Submission 2 Template 2T = 2 3 5 Jd I i~ o 1 (Your name) (Student #) BIO152 Fall 2024, Prof. Rawle Scientific Literacy Project Submission 2 = Argumentation Map Argumentation Map: Question: Does intermittent fasting improve metabolic health more effectively than continuous calorie restriction? Background: (~3-4 sentences on background. Needs to be referenced, and you can use secondary sources for this section only) Arguing for the \"yes"\" side: Arguing for the \"ne\" side: Argument 1 for \"yes\": (1 sentence) >Evidence (Write several sentences about the evidence supporting Argument 1. Must be referenced using Mature Style) Argument 2 for \"yes\": (1 sentence) >Evidence (Write several sentences about the evidence supporting Argument 2. Must be referenced using Mature Style) Argument 3 for \"yes\": (1 sentence) >Evidence (Write several sentences about the evidence supporting Argument 3. Must be referenced using Mature Style) Argument 1 for \"no: (1 sentence) >Evidence (Write several sentences about the evidence supporting Argument 1. Must be referenced using Nature Style) Argument 2 for \"ne\": (1 sentence) >Evidence (Write several sentences about the evidence supporting Argument 2. Must be referenced using Nature Style) Argument 3 for \"ne": (1 sentence) >Evidence (Write several sentences about the evidence supporting Argument 3. Must be referenced using Mature Style) I & Cannot drop at current location. (You can add additional arguments and (You can add additional arguments and pieces of evidence here if it fits your pieces of evidence here if it fits your guestionftopic...) guestion,/topic...) Conclusion: What is the answer to your guestion? (A few sentences here, must include references in Nature style) References: s MNote: list references here in numerical order to where they appeared above. s References must be peer-reviewed references, listed in Nature style. Each piece of evidence needs a primary peer-reviewed source. Note, you can use secondary sources (i.e., reviews) but only in the background section Please make sure you Argumentation Map has the following: 1. Arguments for the \"yes\" and "no\" side are clearly laid out and well explained. Point form is fine. 2. The supporting evidence you have provided is relevant to each argument. You have clearly explained the evidence and explained how it supports the argument statement. 3. You have stated a clear conclusion and have briefly explained the evidence that supports your conclusion. 4, All pieces of evidence are referenced using Nature Style. Mature style citation guide: https://guides.library.utoronto.cafld.php?content_id=34509177 Some Key Terms (with thanks to \"OWL Purdue\") Quotation: * must be identical to the original, using specific words in quotation marks. * every word must match the source document and must be attributed to the original author. Paraphrase * involves putting a passage from source material into your own words. * must be attributed to the original source. * usually shorter than the original passage, taking a somewhat broader passage from the source and condensing it slightly. Summary * involves putting the main idea(s) into your own words, including only the main point(s). * must be attributed to original source. * significantly shorter than the original, taking a very broad overview of the source material. Paraphrase Paraphrase is: your own rendition of essential information and ideas expressed by someone else, presented in a new form. * one legitimate way (when accompanied by accurate documentation) to borrow from a source. * a more detailed restatement than a summary. * With thanks to \"OWL Purdue\" for this definition How to Paraphrase Reread the original passage until you understand its full meaning. * Set the original aside, and write/type your paraphrase on a piece of paper (don't worry if you didn't get exact numbers rightyou can add them IaterY * Write a few words below your paraphrase to remind you later how you think you'll use the material. * Check your rendition with the original to make sure that your version accurately expresses all the essential information in a new form. * Rewrite it again without looking at the original, changing as many words as possible. * Use quotation marks to identify any unique term or phraseology you have borrowed exactly from the source. * Record the source (including the page) in your notes so that you can credit it easily if necessary. Why Paraphrase? * Forces you to critically read and develop a full and deep understanding of the source material. * Helps you develop your own vocabulary. Allows you to participate in the scholarly conversation with your own voice, without requiring you to contribute something completely new. Good Example: The Original Passage The Paraphrase Effectiveness against measles was investigated in three cohort studies Demicheli, Rivetti, and Di Pietrantoj (Marin 2006; Marolla 1998; Ong 2007). One cohort study (Marolla 1998) report on a cohort study that evaluated the effectiveness of MMR assessed the efficacy of MMR vaccination in preventing clinical cases of measles in children aged 18 to 90 vaccinations against measles in months from several local health 2745 children between the ages of agencies in Rome, Italy (n = 2745). 18 and 90 months. Three different Vaccination was performed with three different commercial MMR vaccines, vaccines were administered, two two containing both Schwarz strain with the Schwarz strain (Pluserix (Pluserix and Morupar) and one other prepared with Edmonston-Zagreb and Morupar) and one with the strain (Triviraten). Vaccines Edmonston-Zabreb strain effectiveness was calculated by using the following formula [1-(measles (Triviraten). Calculating incidence among vaccinated/measles effectiveness as [1-(measles incidence among unvaccinated) x 100]. incidence among vaccinated / Effectiveness (one dose) was estimated to be 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) measles incidence among 88 to 99) in the Morupar study arm, unvaccinated) x 100], the study whereas no measles cases were found among Pluserix recipients. found Pluserix was 100% effective, Effectiveness was comparably high while Morupar was 97% and (95%; 95% CI 90 to 98) when Triviraten Triviraten was 95%.9 was administered.University of Toronto \"Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters\" NOTE: \"Wherever in this Code an offence is described as depending on "knowing", the offence shall likewise be deemed to have been committed if the person ought reasonably to have known.\" In Other Words olgnorance is no excuse oAccidental plagiarism is as serious an offence as intentional plagiarism Why is Plagiarism taken Seriously? * |t denies the mutuality and interdependence which are the heart of scholarship. * |t prevents students from developing their own writing and research (and many other related) skills. * |[n short, you can't write effectively and contribute to the scholarly conversation unless you know how to paraphrase properly and avoid plagiarism. Using Al * In this course, you can make use of such Al services as ChatGPT in the same way that you could use Google or human writing support * Whatever the case, the principle is the same: outside sources can support you, but the actual writing and other work has to be done by you (because otherwise you don't actually learn!) * |n other words, Al can help you look for stuff or critique your work, but the actual work has to be your ownyou are not permitted to copy/paste material directly from an Al source into your assignment Before you use Al, please consider the environmental impact and consequences of doing so (Professor Rawle will speak more about this ... Rubric for this assignment: Argumentation Map Rubric Criteria Tapic Question YES Argumentation & Evidence MO Argumentation & Evidence Conclusion References - Peer Reviewed References - Listed in Mature Style 2 pts Competent Question is present, and is in the form of a yes vs no question, and is grounded in science. 12 to =0 pts Developmental Stages Arguments (-3} are clearly laid out and well explained. The supporting evidence is relevant to each argument, and the student has explained HOW the evidence supports the argument. 12 to =0 pts Developmental Stages Arguments (-3} are clearly laid out and well explained. The supporting evidence is relevant to each argument, and the student has explained HOW the evidence supports the argument, 3pts 1.5 pts Competent Conclusion states which argument has the most support, and contains a note about rationale, 3 to =0 pts Competent References are peer-reviewed, and the references tied to pieces of evidence are primary. 3to>0pts Competent Ratings 1 pts Partial problems with question Meeds some wark Conclusion states which side of the question has the most support, but is missing a note about rationale. 0 pts Meeds attention Question is missing. or is not in the form of a yes vs no guestion, or is not grounded in science. 0 pts Marks 0 pts Mo Marks 0 pts Meeds attention Conclusion is missing or does not state with argument has the most support. Opts Mo Marks 0 pts Mo Marks References are listed in Mature style: as embedded exponents throughout the Argumentation map. and in a numerical list at the end of the file. 2 pts 12 pts 12 pts 3pts 3 pts 3 pts Total Points: 35