MedTron most appropriately should sue for wrongful interference with a

select answer

$.$

Assessment question

St$.$ Francis told Hubert that the contract

select answer

$.$ St$.$ Francis

select answer

to Hubert at a

select answer

salary. Based on these facts, it

select answer

that St$.$ Francis intentionally induced Hubert to break his contract with MedTron.

Assessment question

Hubert

select answer

liable for intentional interference with a contract because

select answer

$.$

Assessment question

What If the Facts Were Different?

Assume that in the relevant jurisdiction, contracts with clauses restricting working for competitors for more than six months are deemed illegal and unenforceable.

Wrongful interference with a contractual relationship requires the existence of

select answer

$,$ third party

select answer

$,$ and

select answer

$.$ Given these facts, the element of

select answer

is missing from a wrongful interference with a contractual relationship claim. Given these facts, St$.$ Francis likely

select answer

liable for wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.