Question: St . Francis told Hubert that the contract was enforceable . St . Francis offered a job to Hubert at a similar salary. Based on

St. Francis told Hubert that the contract
was enforceable
. St. Francis
offered a job
to Hubert at a
similar
salary. Based on these facts, it
appears
that St. Francis intentionally induced Hubert to break his contract with MedTron.
Assessment question
Hubert
is
liable for intentional interference with a contract because
only the third party who induced another to break a contract is liable
.
Assessment question
What If the Facts Were Different?
Assume that in the relevant jurisdiction, contracts with clauses restricting working for competitors for more than six months are deemed illegal and unenforceable.
Wrongful interference with a contractual relationship requires the existence of
an agreement
, third party
knowledge
, and
intentional inducement
. Given these facts, the element of
a valid contract
is missing from a wrongful interference with a contractual relationship claim. Given these facts, St. Francis likely
is
liable for wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!