Need answer for question asked

ETHICS DILEMMA | 1 As companies prepared plans to keep their businesses operating if the HINI (swine) flu pandemic materialized thorny issues arose. At one small business, for example, the boss sent two employees home on "indefinite leave" after the employees' children's school was closed down because of an HINI outbreak there. Neither of their chil- dren had flu symptoms, nor did the employees. Now they're out of paid sick day leaves and are losing pay. At Procter & Gamble, executives asked company doctors whether it should try to secure a private stash of Tamiflu for its staff. One of the company's medical leaders responded, "How ethical would it be if we were holding supplies that the general public didn't have access to but badly needed?") What do you think? Is it ethical for a business to be overly cautious in protecting employees? Is it ethical for a company to protect its own employees at the expense of public protection? What would you do in this situation