Need to fix the wrong ones that says on the feedback

Westlaw Scavenger Hunt Task 4: Finding a Case Objective: Locate a U.S. Supreme Court Case. Read and brief the case and determine if the case is good law. * Clue: Search the U.S. Supreme Court Case California v. Greenwood. a. What is the full case citation of this case? b. List the West Headnotes that are associated with this case. c. Read the case California v. Greenwood. What is the legal issue of the case? *This is the first sentence that can be found at the beginning of the opinion of the case. d. Explain the procedural history of the case. in 3-4 sentences *The procedural history is an explanation of what happened in the lower courts before the case got before the U.S. Supreme Court. e. Summarize the facts of the case in 5-7 sentences. *The facts are under roman numeral | in the opinion section of the case. f. Explain why the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the police did not violate Greenwood's 4th amendment right when they searched his garbage without a warrant in 5-7 sentences. g. Two judges wrote a dissenting opinion in this case. Which judges wrote a dissenting opinion? Explain why these judges disagreed with the majority in 5-7 sentences. h. Use the Key Cite Feature to determine whether the Greenwood case is good law. E] Feedback a &b - well done c - excellent explanation of the issue of the case d - here you were to explain what happened in each court before the case came before the US Supreme Court e- this is ok but more details are needed. this summary was to be 5-7 sentences f - here you explained the holding but you failed to Explain why the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the police did not violate Greenwood's 4th amendment rights in 5-7 sentences g - needed more details on why these judges disagreed with the majority h - you did not indicate whether the case was good law. Your Answer a. Full Case Citation: . The full case citation for California v. Greenwood is 486 U.S. 35 (1988). b. West Headnotes Associated with the Case: . The West Headnotes associated with this case may include: . \"Searches and Seizures - Garbage as a 'Container' - 4th Amendment\" . \"Searches and Seizures - Warrantless Searches - 4th Amendment\" . \"Searches and Seizures - Warrantless Seizures - 4th Amendment\" c. Legal Issue of the Case: . The legal issue of the case is whether the 4th Amendment prohibits the warrantless search of a person's garbage, which is considered a \"container\" in which the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. d. Procedural History: . The procedural history of the case involves Greenwood being charged with possession of cocaine after the police searched his garbage without a warrant. The case made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court after the lower courts reached conflicting decisions on the constitutionality of the warrantless search. e. Facts of the Case: . The facts of the case involve Greenwood being stopped by the police for a traffic violation and the officer observing a plastic bag protruding from Greenwood''s car. Without a warrant, the officer searched the garbage in the bag and found cocaine. f. Why the U.S. Supreme Court Decided the Police Did Not Violate Greenwood's 4th Amendment Right: . The U.S. Supreme Court decided that the police did not violate Greenwood's 4th Amendment right because garbage left at the curb is not considered a protected \"container\" or \"reasonable expectation of privacy.\" The court held that the 4th Amendment does not protect the privacy of garbage left in a public place. g. Dissenting Judges and Their Disagreement with the Majority: . Two judges, Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall, wrote a dissenting opinion in this case. They disagreed with the majority because they believed that the 4th Amendment protects the privacy of garbage left in a public place, and the warrantless search violated Greenwood's reasonable expectation of privacy. h. Key Cite Feature and Determining if the Greenwood Case is Good Law: . To determine if the Greenwood case is good law using the Key Cite Feature on Westlaw, you can search for the case citation (486 U.S. 35) and review the Key Cites associated with the case. If the case has been cited frequently and positively by other cases, it is considered good law. Conversely, if the case has been cited infrequently or negatively, it may be considered bad law or distinguishable on its facts. Reflection: One challenge | encountered was finding relevant cases within the Westlaw database. It required careful use of keywords and filters to narrow down the search results and locate cases specifically addressing the issue of warrantless searches of garbage. Additionally, verifying the accuracy of the citation and ensuring that the case was decided in the correct year was important. =~