PART 1

Based on Terry v Ohio (1968), answer the following questions?

1. What were the current and dissenting opinions in this case?

2. What is your perspective on the outcome of this case?

PART 2:

1. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Case attrition refers to the number of arrests that result in no conviction or conviction resulting from reduced charges. Three reasons for a case attrition are:

1. Insufficient evidence

Pro: dismissing weak cases ensures that innocent individuals are not wrongfully convicted. It upholds the principle of "innocent until proven guilty."

Con: if crucial evidence is overlooked, guilty parties may escape justice. Victims may feel let down if their cases are dropped due to insufficient evidence.

1. Witness reluctance or intimidation

Pro: protecting witnesses is essential for maintaining trust in the legal system. Encouraging cooperation ensures accurate case outcomes.

Con: when witnesses refuse to testify, cases may collapse, and perpetrators may go unpunished. This undermines justice.

1. Prosecutorial discretion

Pro: discretion allows efficient allocation of resources, focusing on serious crimes. It prevents overburdening the system.

Con: overreliance on discretion may lead to unequal treatment. Some cases may be dropped due to bias or political considerations.