Part 2: Case Questions - Using course material covered in class answer the following questions. 1. You as a manager don't know how to solve this ethical dilemma; your boss is out of town. Where will you seek advise on what needs to be done? Would it be better to keep it quiet? Explain. (10 marks) 2. Set out the possible course of action open to you, which is the most convincing to do? ( 10 marks) | ted compahy hardware, and access to wine contalring tmaterial at an exples? is tantambunt to 9605 misconguct and may result in the somodiste tervini your Aoffice' pou tave' a quick chat alaout his work and toll thim that you dy, pour pleased with the focecabe he pot cogethet oye the byeekerid.dtwercyou bily probiem with the laptop's history fide. When you bel him witat has yurd zers? iteribly embarrased and assides yoe that the thas abobleligy no lides how thi to she the laptop a cocople of Aimses onerathe wheloend to check his enamis volunteer amy more information about the friend inyohved. company should have access to. Yoe ceminid paul of this and the tengy company not realize there was any such policy. You are lelt wondering witenime fant ont Was that anyooe did arty training around the ethich policyc-certaithy no i ctial scratching your hesd, you tell Paul that you will need 24 hours fo atidi: you get on with preparing for the team meeting. While driving home that evening, you turn the bsue over and ove inyy Yes, there is a corporate policy with regard tol web access and ipesson Lampis iy resources. And in principle you agree with this-after all, you were part of \$2 coctamittee that designed the policy in the first place. A company Wie yours has a be able to have clarily on such issues, and there have to be controls on what the sobpeny/s equipment is used for-no doubt about that. You cannot help thinking inst Paul has been pretty stupid in breaking the rules-whether he visited the sites hitiselt or not. - Orithe other hand, you are also having a few problems with taking this further. oven the amount of embarrassment this has caused Paul already; is this likely to be. list a one-oft? Does the company not need Paul's experience and expertise, especialfrow with the big launch a few days off? Why cause problems over a tew websites, unpecialy when the company has not been very active in communicating its ethics Why? Would it be better to keep it quiet, give him a waming, and yust get on with wete Iunch? This looks set to be a tough call. Part 2: Case Questions - Using course material covered in class answer the following questions. 1. You as a manager don't know how to solve this ethical dilemma; your boss is out of town. Where will you seek advise on what needs to be done? Would it be better to keep it quiet? Explain. (10 marks) 2. Set out the possible course of action open to you, which is the most convincing to do? ( 10 marks) | ted compahy hardware, and access to wine contalring tmaterial at an exples? is tantambunt to 9605 misconguct and may result in the somodiste tervini your Aoffice' pou tave' a quick chat alaout his work and toll thim that you dy, pour pleased with the focecabe he pot cogethet oye the byeekerid.dtwercyou bily probiem with the laptop's history fide. When you bel him witat has yurd zers? iteribly embarrased and assides yoe that the thas abobleligy no lides how thi to she the laptop a cocople of Aimses onerathe wheloend to check his enamis volunteer amy more information about the friend inyohved. company should have access to. Yoe ceminid paul of this and the tengy company not realize there was any such policy. You are lelt wondering witenime fant ont Was that anyooe did arty training around the ethich policyc-certaithy no i ctial scratching your hesd, you tell Paul that you will need 24 hours fo atidi: you get on with preparing for the team meeting. While driving home that evening, you turn the bsue over and ove inyy Yes, there is a corporate policy with regard tol web access and ipesson Lampis iy resources. And in principle you agree with this-after all, you were part of \$2 coctamittee that designed the policy in the first place. A company Wie yours has a be able to have clarily on such issues, and there have to be controls on what the sobpeny/s equipment is used for-no doubt about that. You cannot help thinking inst Paul has been pretty stupid in breaking the rules-whether he visited the sites hitiselt or not. - Orithe other hand, you are also having a few problems with taking this further. oven the amount of embarrassment this has caused Paul already; is this likely to be. list a one-oft? Does the company not need Paul's experience and expertise, especialfrow with the big launch a few days off? Why cause problems over a tew websites, unpecialy when the company has not been very active in communicating its ethics Why? Would it be better to keep it quiet, give him a waming, and yust get on with wete Iunch? This looks set to be a tough call