Part C... < ZamZung: Supply Chained wwwwwwwwww Adapted from Samsung Child Labour: An Ethical Perspective by...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Part C... < ZamZung: Supply Chained wwwwwwwwww Adapted from "Samsung Child Labour: An Ethical Perspective" by L. McAllister, X. Nei, Y. Qian, and T. Stracuzza, Unpublished Manuscript, 2012. < < In September 2015, a U.S. human rights organization called Friends of Andorra published a report exposing ethical issues at certain suppliers of ZamZung Electronic Co. in the Principality of Andorra. The document unveiled a number of questionable labour practices at these manufacturing facilities. Of particular note were actions taken at Flux Cap, Inc. (FCI) and Quantum-Lambda Electronics (QLE). < At Flux Cap, employees are paid very low wages. The income of the average employee at FCI amounts to approximately 70% of the Government of Andorra's estimate of the value of a "subsistence income" in the Principality. Most Andorrans are Pastafarians, who worship The Flying Spaghetti Monster, and Flux Cap seems to require Pastafarianism of all its employees: for example, it refuses to hire Baconites because they worship The Piggy in The Middle. FCI also has a policy based on ancient Andorran tradition that requires management-level employees to be male, and has repeatedly been accused of age discrimination - on many occasions it has fired older employees without notice (in violation of their employment contracts) in order to further reduce labour costs. < < At Quantum-Lambda there is strong evidence that managers subject employees to physical and verbal abuse. It also requires some employees to work with specific carcinogenic materials, though this is prohibited by Andorran law. Quantum-Lambda also seems to employ at least some elementary-school-aged children, who must work long hours when other Andorran youths are at school. < ZamZung has engaged in substantial vertical integration in the past, and currently owns controlling interests in a number of its suppliers; but it does not own Flux Cap or Quantum-Lambda. Some of the companies that are controlled by ZamZung have minor labour-related problems of their own; but overall ZamZung holds them to much higher standards than those exhibited at Flux Cap and Quantum-Lambda. < In response to the report from Friends of Andorra, executives at ZamZung are considering buying both Flux Cap and Quantum-Lambda in order to facilitate control of the supply chain and impose changes to improve labour practices at FCI and QLE. Shareholder groups at ZamZung, however, seem to be united in their opposition to the acquisitions, as they are convinced that the increased costs that would result would seriously diminish the value of their ZamZung holdings. ZamZung executives believe the shareholders are being short-sighted, but have not been able to sway them. < < Think about this situation from various DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE perspectives and suggest what ZamZung should do. For the purposes of this assignment you can assume that there are only two options: buy FCI and QLE, or do not buy FCI and QLE- however, remember that that is a false dilemma. In the "real world" there would probably be other options to consider. Some Astonishingly Helpful Advice, Possibly: < Clearly state any assumptions you make about the facts of the case. < You can focus your analysis on basic principles of distributive justice (i.e., socialist, capitalist, libertarian, and egalitarian principles). I.e., for the purposes of this exercise, you can ignore things like compensatory and retributive justice, and Rawls" "Justice as Fairness". Recall that in any given situation it may be the case that not all principles of distributive justice are relevant to consider. If you think a principle is not relevant to this case, say so and explain your position (very briefly) so that I know that you have thought about it. See the bottom of this page for some questions you might ask yourself in order to determine which principles are relevant. < This may seem obvious to you, but it isn't to some people, apparently. Remember that rationally choosing among options requires you to compare them on the same set of criteria. For example, suppose in some situation (probably not the one above) you have determined that only the capitalist principle and the socialist principle are relevant to consider. Saying that "Option 1 reflects capitalist justice and Option 2 reflects socialist justice" doesn't allow you to compare Options 1 & 2 and choose between them, because you have evaluated Option 1 using one criterion (the capitalist principle) and Option 2 using a different criterion (the socialist principle). You need to assess each option using all the relevant criteria, so that you can compare the options with respect to each relevant principle. (E.g., you would need to assess BOTH Option 1 and Option 2 in terms of how they correspond to BOTH the capitalist principle and the socialist principle. Then you could choose a best option according to each principle.) < Don't be at all surprised if different principles of justice favour different options, since the principles are very different in terms of what is seen as important (e.g., freedom regarding use of private property (libertarian) vs. needs (socialist)). Because of this, it probably makes sense for you to state a separate conclusion (i.e., what ZamZung should do) based on each different justice principle that you apply. Do not forget to clearly state and justify your overall conclusion (i.e., what ZamZung should do, and why), based on all your applications of the (relevant) principles of distributive justice. Some basic questions you might ask to help determine which principles of distributive justice are relevant to consider in a given situation: Is there some sense in which certain stakeholders should be treated equally (because there is no relevant reason not to), and the decision to be made influences whether or not this happens? Does the decision influence the extent to which stakeholders' contributions are appropriately 'rewarded'? Are there 'needy' stakeholders whose well-being is affected by the decision? Are there stakeholders who have particular 'abilities' that would allow them to bear certain 'burdens' of the decision better than others? Does the decision affect stakeholders' abilities to use what is theirs (i.e., what they 'own') how they would like? Keep in mind that some things that we seem to 'possess' we don't actually own. E.g., "my" job is actually just a job that I happen to have at the moment - I don't own it, and it isn't my property. Part C... < ZamZung: Supply Chained wwwwwwwwww Adapted from "Samsung Child Labour: An Ethical Perspective" by L. McAllister, X. Nei, Y. Qian, and T. Stracuzza, Unpublished Manuscript, 2012. < < In September 2015, a U.S. human rights organization called Friends of Andorra published a report exposing ethical issues at certain suppliers of ZamZung Electronic Co. in the Principality of Andorra. The document unveiled a number of questionable labour practices at these manufacturing facilities. Of particular note were actions taken at Flux Cap, Inc. (FCI) and Quantum-Lambda Electronics (QLE). < At Flux Cap, employees are paid very low wages. The income of the average employee at FCI amounts to approximately 70% of the Government of Andorra's estimate of the value of a "subsistence income" in the Principality. Most Andorrans are Pastafarians, who worship The Flying Spaghetti Monster, and Flux Cap seems to require Pastafarianism of all its employees: for example, it refuses to hire Baconites because they worship The Piggy in The Middle. FCI also has a policy based on ancient Andorran tradition that requires management-level employees to be male, and has repeatedly been accused of age discrimination - on many occasions it has fired older employees without notice (in violation of their employment contracts) in order to further reduce labour costs. < < At Quantum-Lambda there is strong evidence that managers subject employees to physical and verbal abuse. It also requires some employees to work with specific carcinogenic materials, though this is prohibited by Andorran law. Quantum-Lambda also seems to employ at least some elementary-school-aged children, who must work long hours when other Andorran youths are at school. < ZamZung has engaged in substantial vertical integration in the past, and currently owns controlling interests in a number of its suppliers; but it does not own Flux Cap or Quantum-Lambda. Some of the companies that are controlled by ZamZung have minor labour-related problems of their own; but overall ZamZung holds them to much higher standards than those exhibited at Flux Cap and Quantum-Lambda. < In response to the report from Friends of Andorra, executives at ZamZung are considering buying both Flux Cap and Quantum-Lambda in order to facilitate control of the supply chain and impose changes to improve labour practices at FCI and QLE. Shareholder groups at ZamZung, however, seem to be united in their opposition to the acquisitions, as they are convinced that the increased costs that would result would seriously diminish the value of their ZamZung holdings. ZamZung executives believe the shareholders are being short-sighted, but have not been able to sway them. < < Think about this situation from various DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE perspectives and suggest what ZamZung should do. For the purposes of this assignment you can assume that there are only two options: buy FCI and QLE, or do not buy FCI and QLE- however, remember that that is a false dilemma. In the "real world" there would probably be other options to consider. Some Astonishingly Helpful Advice, Possibly: < Clearly state any assumptions you make about the facts of the case. < You can focus your analysis on basic principles of distributive justice (i.e., socialist, capitalist, libertarian, and egalitarian principles). I.e., for the purposes of this exercise, you can ignore things like compensatory and retributive justice, and Rawls" "Justice as Fairness". Recall that in any given situation it may be the case that not all principles of distributive justice are relevant to consider. If you think a principle is not relevant to this case, say so and explain your position (very briefly) so that I know that you have thought about it. See the bottom of this page for some questions you might ask yourself in order to determine which principles are relevant. < This may seem obvious to you, but it isn't to some people, apparently. Remember that rationally choosing among options requires you to compare them on the same set of criteria. For example, suppose in some situation (probably not the one above) you have determined that only the capitalist principle and the socialist principle are relevant to consider. Saying that "Option 1 reflects capitalist justice and Option 2 reflects socialist justice" doesn't allow you to compare Options 1 & 2 and choose between them, because you have evaluated Option 1 using one criterion (the capitalist principle) and Option 2 using a different criterion (the socialist principle). You need to assess each option using all the relevant criteria, so that you can compare the options with respect to each relevant principle. (E.g., you would need to assess BOTH Option 1 and Option 2 in terms of how they correspond to BOTH the capitalist principle and the socialist principle. Then you could choose a best option according to each principle.) < Don't be at all surprised if different principles of justice favour different options, since the principles are very different in terms of what is seen as important (e.g., freedom regarding use of private property (libertarian) vs. needs (socialist)). Because of this, it probably makes sense for you to state a separate conclusion (i.e., what ZamZung should do) based on each different justice principle that you apply. Do not forget to clearly state and justify your overall conclusion (i.e., what ZamZung should do, and why), based on all your applications of the (relevant) principles of distributive justice. Some basic questions you might ask to help determine which principles of distributive justice are relevant to consider in a given situation: Is there some sense in which certain stakeholders should be treated equally (because there is no relevant reason not to), and the decision to be made influences whether or not this happens? Does the decision influence the extent to which stakeholders' contributions are appropriately 'rewarded'? Are there 'needy' stakeholders whose well-being is affected by the decision? Are there stakeholders who have particular 'abilities' that would allow them to bear certain 'burdens' of the decision better than others? Does the decision affect stakeholders' abilities to use what is theirs (i.e., what they 'own') how they would like? Keep in mind that some things that we seem to 'possess' we don't actually own. E.g., "my" job is actually just a job that I happen to have at the moment - I don't own it, and it isn't my property.
Expert Answer:
Related Book For
Income Tax Fundamentals 2013
ISBN: 9781285586618
31st Edition
Authors: Gerald E. Whittenburg, Martha Altus Buller, Steven L Gill
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
The Crazy Eddie fraud may appear smaller and gentler than the massive billion-dollar frauds exposed in recent times, such as Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme, frauds in the subprime mortgage market, the...
-
Googles ease of use and superior search results have propelled the search engine to its num- ber one status, ousting the early dominance of competitors such as WebCrawler and Infos- eek. Even later...
-
If a quantity is measured to be Q and its exact value is A, then the relative error in Q is If the exact value is A = 35 and you want the relative error in Q to be less than or equal to 0.02 (or 2%),...
-
A parabola with an equation in the form y = ax2 + bx + c passes through the points (-2, -32), (1, 7), and (3, 63). a. Set up systems and use matrices to find the values of a, b, and c for this...
-
Give an example of an input other than direct materials and direct labour where calculating yield and mix variances might be useful. Explain your reasoning briefly.
-
Locate the income statement of a company in each of the following industries: pharmaceutical, technology, retailergroceries, and automobile manufacturer. Calculate the gross profit margin, operating...
-
On December 1, Blue Mountain Production Inc. had a work in process inventory of 1,200 units that were complete as to materials and 50% complete as to labor and overhead. December 1 costs follow:...
-
It takes 27.5 hours for a 25-gram sample of element X to decay to a final amount of 5 grams. What is the half-life of element X in days? = 27.5 hours A 0 = 25 g A F = 5 g t =?? Nitrogen gas is being...
-
Consider the function: int mystery ( ( int w ) ) { { if ( ( w < 0 ) < 0 ) return 0 0 ; int x = = mystery ( ( w 2 ) - 2 ) ; return w - x; } } Which line's removal would cause infinite recursion?...
-
A 1989 radio commercial claimed If you have a LifeAlert security system, your chances of becoming a victim of a serious crime are 3,000 to 4,000 percent less than your neighbors. Is this possible?
-
Suppose that you have ten observations that have a mean of 7, a median of 6, and a standard deviation of 3. If you add 5 to the value of each observation, what are the new values of the a. Mean? b....
-
Explain how the following two newspaper headlines that appeared on the same day could both be accurate: Orders for Machine Tools Increased 45.5% in October ; October Orders for Machine Tools...
-
Limited Liability is considering insuring Howard Hardsells voice for $1,000,000. They figure that there is only a 0.001 probability that they will have to pay off. If they charge $2,000 for this...
-
Answer this letter to Ask Marilyn [28]: Youre at a party with 199 other guests when robbers break in and announce that they are going to rob one of you. They put 199 blank pieces of paper in a hat,...
-
Read the case study Politicians and Their Music: How does the use of music in a political campaign play a role in establishing a candidates brand?
-
CLASS PERIO Solving Linear Equations: Variable on Both Sides Solve each equation. 1) 6r+ 7 = 13 + 7r 3) -7x-3x+2=-8x-8 5)-14 +66+7-26=1+5b 7) n-3n = 14-4n 2) 13-4x=1-x 4)-8-x= x - 4x 6)n+2=-14-n 8)...
-
Go to the PMI Web site and examine the link Membership. What do you discover when you begin navigating among the various chapters and cooperative organizations associated with the PMI? How does this...
-
Go to http://www.pmi.org/business-solutions/casestudies and examine some of the cases included on the Web page. What do they suggest about the challenges of managing projects successfully? The...
-
Using your favorite search engine (Google, Yahoo!, etc.), type in the keywords project and project management. Randomly select three of the links that come up on the screen. Summarize what you find.
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App