peer response to this Whether individuals should be given Miranda warnings at the time of their arrest, irrespective of the guidelines set by the Supreme Court, is a complex and intricate issue. Issuing Miranda warnings at the point of arrest can protect individuals' rights by ensuring they are fully aware of their right against self-incrimination. This could also bring clarity and transparency to the process for law enforcement and suspects, avoiding confusion about the timing of their rights (Miranda rights for criminal suspects under the law, 2023). Moreover, early advisement could prevent coercion by ensuring individuals understand their right to remain silent before questioning begins. Conversely, the absence of mandatory Miranda warnings at the point of arrest could present risks (Tuthill, 2024). Law enforcement often operates under time constraints, and the lack of Miranda warnings could lead to confusion about the timing of rights. This could complicate procedures and hinder investigations, particularly in high-pressure situations. In conclusion, the issue of Miranda warnings at the time of arrest is multifaceted. While the Supreme Court guidelines serve a legal purpose, a compelling argument exists for emphasizing rights awareness to promote fairness and justice. Striking a balance between effective policing and safeguarding individual rights is crucial, and discussions regarding this issue continue to evolve within the broader context of criminal justice reform