Pick a general topic and write a research objective and research question (you should use the same research objective and question that you developed for Applied Activity 1. If you cannot find any relevant information for your topic, you may adjust your research objective and question as needed please contact your professor to discuss this if you need to make changes). 2. Find at least five (5) secondary sources that are relevant to your research question and of high quality (use the CRAAP test to evaluate the quality of sources) using the Cambrian College Library database and/or Google Scholar. These sources should be peer-reviewed journal articles or from relevant business databases (IBIS World, Statista, etc.). 3. Based on these 5 or more references, write a literature review. Your literature review must contain the following: Introduction i. Identify your topic. ii. State your research objective that identifies WHY you are doing this research. iii. State your research question that explains WHAT you want to learn. Body paragraph(s) i. Give an overview of relevant sources including their research problem, methods, and conclusion. ii. Synthesize by comparing, contrasting, and connecting your secondary sources while relating them back to the original research problem. iii. If you examine multiple themes in your secondary sources, organize the review thematically so that each theme is within a paragraph. Conclusion i. Summarize the main findings from the secondary sources that you reviewed. ii. Provides an answer to your original research question (or what information you were able to find to help you answer your question). 4. Make sure to appropriately cite material using in text citations and a References page. Format You must follow proper APA format for this literature review which includes: 1. An accessible font (11-point or 12-point depending on your choice). 2. Page numbers (at the top of each page, flush right following APA format). 3. A title page including the title of the paper, author's name, institutional affiliation, course number and name, instructor name, and assignment due date following APA format. 4. In text citations in APA format. 5. Refences page in APA format. Remember you can obtain full APA references from the Cambrian College Library website and Google Scholar. This makes it easy to cite all works used and make sure you are staying in accordance with Cambrians Academic Integrity Policy. It is also recommended that you use Grammarly to check your work for plagiarism BEFORE you submit your literature review. Please note that you do NOT have to create an abstract because this is not a full research paper. RUBRIC Criteria 0 marks 1 mark 2 marks 3 marks 4 marks Organization The review is NOT organized with an introduction, body, and conclusion. The review is organized with an introduction, body paragraph(s), and conclusion. The review is organized appropriately with an introduction, body paragraph(s) that are organized thematically, and conclusion. N/A N/A Writing Style Errors in word selection, usage, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and informal writing detract from meaning. Many errors in word selection, usage, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and formal writing style. Some errors in word selection, usage, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and formal writing style. Few errors in word selection, usage, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and formal writing style. No errors in word selection, usage, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, capitalization and formal writing style. APA Format No correct APA formatting for the review. Many errors in APA format for page format (numbers and fonts), title page, in text citations, and references. Some errors in APA format for page format (numbers and fonts), title page, in text citations, and references. Few errors in APA format for page format (numbers and fonts), title page, in text citations, and references. No errors in APA format for page format (numbers and fonts), title page, in text citations, and references. Secondary Literature - Relevance and Quality 0 of 5 secondary sources have an explicit relationship to the research problem and are of good quality (peer-reviewed & pass the CRAAP test). 1 or 2 of 5 secondary sources have an explicit relationship to the research problem and are of good quality (peer-reviewed & pass the CRAAP test). 3 of 5 secondary sources have an explicit relationship to the research problem and are of good quality (peer-reviewed & pass the CRAAP test). 4 of 5 secondary sources have an explicit relationship to the research problem and are of good quality (peer-reviewed & pass the CRAAP test). All 5 secondary sources have an explicit relationship to the research problem and are of good quality (peer-reviewed & pass the CRAAP test). Introduction No statement of the research topic, objective, and question. Unclear statement of the research topic, objective, and question. Somewhat clear statement of the research topic, objective, and question. Mostly clear statement of the research topic, objective, and question. Clearly restates the research topic, objective, and question. Body Content The content from 0 of 5 sources is covered in depth without being redundant. The content from 1 or 2 of 5 sources is covered in depth without being redundant. The content from 3 of 5 sources is covered in depth without being redundant. The content from 4 of 5 sources is covered in depth without being redundant. The content from all 5 sources is covered in depth without being redundant. Body Synthesis Demonstrates minimal synthesis of material and understanding of how the sources connect to the research problem. Synthesizes the content from few sources and demonstrates limited understanding of how the sources connect to the research problem. Synthesizes some of the content from the sources and demonstrates some understanding of how the sources connect to the research problem. Synthesizes the content from most sources and demonstrates understanding of how the sources connect to the research problem. Clearly synthesizes the content from all sources and demonstrates a thorough understanding of how the sources connect to the research problem. Conclusion Does not restate the main points of the review and provides no answer to the research question. Restates a few of the main points of the review and provides an unclear answer to the research question. Restates some of the main points of the review and provides a somewhat clear answer to the research question. Restates most of the main points of the review and provides a mostly clear answer to the research question. Clearly restates the main points of the review and provides an answer to the research question.

give the answer unique and detailed