Please answer the following question associated with this weeks lecture?

In the pre-classical era (prior to 1700 CE), what are the implications of the ruling elite ultimately getting to decide what unwanted behaviour is a crime? How was criminal justice considered arbitrary in its application?

Beccaria said the threat of punishment controls crime. Aside from the threat of legal punishments, what else do you think might control behaviour?

Does capital punishment work to control crime? Why, or why not?

Does modern neuroscience provide a more accurate way of predicting criminality, or do we run similar risks to those posed by phrenology?

Create a brief chart summarizing:

the major criminological perspectives of classical theory and positivism

the main theorist(s) associated with that perspective

the main point(s) associated with that perspective