Please answer this as soon as possible. Badly Needed. Thank You

Case: Josef and Marie are newly married. After two months, Marie was already pregnant while they encountered some financial problems. Josef was constrained to look for work and found one outside of their province. The husband and wife made an arrangement that while Josef is away, Marie will be staying with her parents who would be assisting her in her pregnancy and childbirth. They have started some savings but decided to have the birth assisted by a traditional midwife (hilot). In her full term, she was having a hard time delivering the child. The midwife could not assist in the delivery because it was beyond her capacity and instructed Marie to go to the hospital Marie was escorted by his father in going to the hospital and he was asked by the attending physician to sign a Hospital Admission Form. Marie was taken to the observation room and was told that a Cesarean Section (CS) needed to be operated for the delivery because spontaneous or normal delivery of the baby could not be obtained. After a few hours, Marie safely delivered their first born daughter. The family of Marie sent a message to Josef informing him of the childbirth. Few days thereafter, Josef was able to go to the side of Marie and their newborn child. He was very happy to see them well. After five days, the Doctor told them that they could be discharged and was presented with the Hospital Bill Josef would not pay. He contended that he should not be held liable for the payment since he was not the one that gave birth but Marie. He also said that the agreement between them is that she would be delivering their child in their home through a traditional midwife. He argues that it was his father-in-law who brought Marie to the hospital and signed the Hospital Admission Form, hence he has nothing to do with the hospital bill. Questions/Issues: 1. Is the contention of Josef tenable? 2. Does Josef incur any liability in the childbirth of Josef? Decide on the issues presented and the possible basis of Obligations of Josef Marie and the father-in-law Write down your answers here. 1. Based on the situation, Josef's reasoning is not good because it is his responsibility to pay the bill because his father-in-law is not Marie's husband and he can actually do so as a parent because of the condition of Marie, so he should not require Josef to pay his father-in-law because it was always his duty as Marie's wife even though they had a conversation. 2. Yes, because she is a husband and they are both married, Josef is responsible for the birth of Marie, so I would assume that she is genuinely accountable and there are laws that must be followed in marriage. Josef should not deny his responsibility, as in their situation, he has to pay the bills because even if they don't talk to the couple in the hospital, he's still obligated because it's an emergency and nothing wants to happen that a midwife can't do So as Marie's wife, Josef has a responsibility, he can't blame his father-in-law who took Marie to the hospital because Marie wants too