please answer this question

CASE STUDY

In 2019, William was appointed by the University of Timez as a Senior Lecturer to teach management subjects in the business faculty. Already William was working in a notable government university; however, because of better proposals and advantages, William was persuaded to join the University of Timez. During his 2nd year of employment, the University of Timez s business has dropped tremendously due to the pandemic. The management of the University of Timez had no choice and started to terminate those under contract for service. The University of Timez ended twenty staff with immediate effect without prior notice. The management is aware that William was hired under a contract of employment. The University of Timez is also aware of the consequences if William s agreement is terminated without a reasonable excuse. The management discovered that William had been late to work several times in June 2020, and there were also several complaints about Williams teaching by a few students. In this manner, the administration began compelling William on his responsibility and searched for fault to end William. He has received a verbal warning after the complaints. The management was convinced of the reason and started to force William to tender his resignation forcefully. It was already the second week of the month, and William`s salary was yet to be paid. William left the premises at noon, and he met an accident while returning home. William was disturbed by the management`s behaviour and could not focus on his work that day. Therefore, he informed the human resource manager that he was leaving during lunch due to health reasons. As a result, He is seriously injured, and the is that he will be permanently a wheelchair user. Despite deducting the amount from his pay slips, William realized that his SOSCO and EPF money had not been credited over the nine months.

ii .Actual dismissal procedures. iii. Liability over the accident

This is a simple law problem question, but working through your answer using the ILAC method below will give you the template for dealing with much more complicated problems. The ILAC Method What is the ILAC method? It stands for Issue Law Application Conclusion and provides a structured method for answering any legal problem question. 1. ISSUE - What is the narrow legal issue, which needs to be resolved in order to advise the parties? 2. LAW - What legal principles need to be applied in order to resolve the issue you have identified? Explain those principles with supporting authority. 3. APPLICATION / ANALYSIS - How does the law apply to this situation? 4. CONCLUSION Reach a conclusion that answers the question and resolves the legal issue. How should you approach a problem question? First, read the question carefully and then consider the following: Who are the parties? Who has done what to whom? What does the question ask you to do? Are you asked to advise a particular party? Are you asked to advise on a particular issue? What area of law might be relevant? Does it concern more than one area of law? Can you narrow it down to a particular aspect or aspects of this area of law? If so, what elements make up these aspects of the law? This is all part of your initial preparation to research and answers the question not all of it will be included in your answer. You then need to start planning and working on your answer.