please help me

\fVector Field (lengths log scaled) Vector Field (lengths log scaled) 30 . . . . . b 25 6 20 -4 15 Vector magnitude 15 Vector magnitude WU - 3 10 10 2 5 . ." 10 15 20 25 10 15 20 25 30 35 Vector Field (lengths log scaled) Vector Field (lengths log scaled) 17.5 17.5 - F 15.0 15.0 12.5 12.5 45 -4 10.0 ctor magnitude 10 0 Vector magnitude 7.5 5.0 5.0 2.5 25 00 0.0 10 15 20 25 30 10 15 20 25 30 4. Conclusions Add here your conclusions about the work and provide a short summary of the experiments and results.Abstract This report explores the connection between electric potential (V) and electric field (-E) using CNC (computer numerical control) technology and voltage probes. The main goal was to uncover how different metal plate setups generate electric fields when exposed to voltage. Electric field vectors, crucial for understanding electric fields, were calculated by measuring electric potential and visualized through 2D plots. Keywords: Electric Field, Voltage, Electric Potential 1. Introduction This lab will utilize the CNC (computer numerical control) component of the Jetson experiment table to use a voltage probe to take readings of an electric field. Each probe reading will be represented by a pixel on a heat map, and the direction of current between the plates will be noted using a vector field plot. This vector field will be produced using a provided python script using the x and y coordinates of the voltage readings, as shown in Eq. 1 and Eq. 2. The difference in voltage and the step size will be used for each calculation. E =- AV Equation 1 X Ax = AV Ay Equation 2 2. Experimental Procedure Four different configurations of metal plates were placed on top of conductive paper and a grid of voltage readings was taken using a CNC probe. One of the metal plates was connected to a power supply of 0.1A, and the other was connected to a ground. The voltage probe was first adjusted to contact the conductive paper at all times. Next, the python script was modified to scan the proper area of the conductive paper, and ensure that the graphs produced represented both metal plates entirely. The step size was kept constant, but the number of steps for the x and y axis were changed for each different plate configuration. 3. Results and Analysis Explain here the results and compare them to expected values from theory, and include any plots or histograms necessary. It should take from a few paragraphs up to a page