PLEASE HELP ME OUT WITH THESE QUESTIONS ASAP

NEED THEM IN 10 MINUTES

From the perspective if a successful litigant, what can actually be a frustration about the costs process involved in litigation?

Question 10 options:

	Although they win, they have to pay the other party's costs.
	Even if they didn't want to be in the litigation, they still have to pay the other party's costs.
	Even though they win, not all of their costs are actually reimbursed.
	They get no reimbursement of costs.

.

If a large company with a significant public profile was being sued because of a drug product failure that dramatically impacted a young child, and it was apparent that company employees had suppressed poor test results during the pre-approval trial stage, what is a likely reason the company might it suggest ADR rather than litigation?

Question 9 options:

	The fact that an arbitrators decision will be binding and likely be favourable to the corporation.
	A need to sustain the operation based on the amount of capital resources committed to its business activities.
	The ability to keep all details of the settlement private and confidential.
	A desire to avoid establishing a common law precedent.

Why might a business be willing to consider alternative dispute resolution instead of formal litigation?

Question 8 options:

	It is private, and it can allow involvement of mediators or arbitrators with considerable subject expertise.
	it is always less costly, and creates private precedent.
	It is always faster, and more responsive.
	It guarantees a less adversarial experience, and a customized outcome