Please help me write a conclusion.... for this

-) INTRODUCTION Our group, consisting of five students from the Organizational Behaviour class, was formed to deliver two mini-case presentations and produce two group process reports. Group F created a team charter to assist in establishing group-building activities and nurturing group members, starting with the first mini case presentation. The team charter has acted as a roadmap for the group, illustrating concentration and providing direction. The first mini case assignment focused on career planning as a decision-making process. This topic allowed the group to learn more about decision-making and how it impacts individuals and managers in organizations. This report will examine how our group did during the preparation and presentation of the first mini-case presentation. Norms, stages of development, power, communications, and decision-making are the five concepts that our group will study. This report aims to provide the reader with an idea of how the group fared in completing the first mini-case presentation. METHODS AND FINDINGS Attitude Forming a five-member group whilst limited to a virtual classroom and group discussions was challenging. What our group seemed to struggle with the most was having the same Text Predictions: On Editor Markup: On a) METHODS AND FINDINGS Attitude Forming a five-member group whilst limited to a virtual classroom and group discussions was challenging. What our group seemed to struggle with the most was having the same schedule to meet at certain times on specific days. Factoring in the late acknowledgment on topics requiring immediate responses. This gave the perception to other members that they did not have the same outlook on what this class meant to them. The situations encountered were expected in some level; It is important that as a group we all work towards obtaining a beneficial solution. Visually examining the norms in the group, each were given a categorical part which had to be completed. The components that were assigned to each member was planned thoroughly. Regular meetings were made to have everyone attend and join in for the discussion where it availed each other to move on with the group project. To collaborate efficiently, we gave each other a hand in components that were challenging in ways and gave positive feedback in areas that could be improved. Some group norms make us to work efficiently but, in some cases, norms that are not up to standards tend to lower the group productivity in which members lose the courage. Effort Text Predictions: On Editor Markup: On Effort The progress of our group is shown here in four stages of development. In the forming stage, On May 5th, one member formed a Microsoft Teams (Teams) team and invited each group member to join. This was specifically designed for the Organizational Behaviour group work. Each group member introduced themselves and specified when they were available to begin working on the team charter and mini-case presentation within the first week of being assigned. Our team members were each given the task of reading the relevant chapter and mini case from the textbook during the first week. For reference, copies of the mini-case rubric as well as the group process report instructions and rubric were uploaded to the Teams' electronic file folders. A draft copy of the Team Charter was also provided in Teams for members to examine and make changes to as needed. One member presented her notes on what the expectations of the mini-case were, as these notes were to be used as a guideline to accomplish the mini-case work. The group chose a time to meet on May 9 through Teams. The time and date were based on all the member's availability, considering their school and work schedules. Unfortunately, not all members attended the meeting, consequently, a new time had to be rescheduled. The group successfully met on May 12 and began storming. In this stage, the group was able to determine the roles each member was to play in the preparation of the presentation. During this stage, the participants recognized obstacles devised strategies to overcome them. Tensions rose at first but dissipated as members contributed to brainstorming ideas and conversations Mombers of the crown woro ancouraging one another and avohonging. Text Predictions: On Editor Markup: On The group successfully met on May 12 and began storming. In this stage, the group was able to determine the roles each member was to play in the preparation of the presentation. During this stage, the participants recognized obstacles and devised strategies to overcome them. Tensions rose at first but dissipated as members contributed to brainstorming ideas and conversations. Members of the group were encouraging one another and exchanging compliments (Meyer, 2020). The group work was making progress and was moving forward as a team. Another meeting was set up to keep the momentum going, and it was decided to meet again on May 17th The group was unable to meet despite being ready to move on to the norming stage due to conflicts with members' personal and work schedules. We reed to meet on May 20 after one person suggested it, but only one other member consented to attend at that time. Unfortunately, just one of the group's members attended the meeting. At this point, group members expressed their dissatisfaction with the inability to arrange a time and really meet. As a result, progress on the project could not continue as planned. The battle to get everyone in the group to meet was palpable. On May 22nd, one of the group members recommended that work be delegated to others. The question of who would decide which jobs to assign and who would allocate them was not supported in this proposal. As the date for delivering our mini case was fast approaching, one member updated the PowerPoint presentation file with information gathered from the May 12th meeting for the group's evaluation. Text Predictions: On Editor Markup: On ) After another failed attempt at collectively working together, two of the five members met on May 27th to break down the PowerPoint presentation file into sections. Members of the group were then permitted to choose whatever sections they desired to use to create their speaking notes. After members had picked their parts, the group arranged to meet on May 29th We didn't proceed into the norming stage until this meeting. As we worked toward completing the presentation, members of the group felt at ease enough to provide helpful suggestions to one another. On the day of our presentation, May 30th, our group got together to rehearse and shake off the anxieties. During this time, our group transitioned from the norming stage to the performance stage. We were confident in our ability to give an informative presentation. Members of the group were working together toward this common goal (Robbins et al., 2020). Contribution Further into the initial project, the conclusion that "Assigning roles to group members can be a good way to improve group work and team effectiveness" (Meyst & Grenier, 2021, para.8). Allocating these specific roles was not necessarily addressed in the first stages of assembly, but when they were brought forth, the group had more functionality. Although there may not be perfect alignment in each other's calendars since some students also have jobs, appointments, and hours of unavailability, communicating to one another the delegations and rolo arnoctations established a conca of understanding as well as trist Text Predictions: On Editor Markup: On ) Although there may not be perfect alignment in each other's calendars since some students also have jobs, appointments, and hours of unavailability, communicating to one another the delegations and role expectations established a sense of understanding as well as trust amongst the group members. Communication during team meetings was effective, having positive and productive discussion on what was needed to be successful. Some group members contributed less to the overall planning of the project, but this can be expected in any team situation. The main breakdown of communication occurred when planning for team meetings. Members of any team must understand the importance of participating in group discission and keeping your team informed of any sudden changes in your availability. There were instances where a team member would share that they were unable to meet at the scheduled time before the time, but also instances where this wasn't the case. Not hearing from one team member on the day of the presentation, caused stress to the rest of the team of whether their parts would need to be delegated to another. According to Carly Gail "when team members are able to communicate, they are able to collaborate; good communication is critical in improving teamwork and teambuilding" (Gail, 2022). Going forward, it is critical that every team member understands the importance of proper communication, so that we may have great success and collaboration in our projects and improve on our mark for the second mini case project. Since the creation of roles for each member consisting of who is responsible for which Text Predictions: On Editor Markup: On Since the creation of roles for each member consisting of who is responsible for which part including when certain section should be completed with setting timelines the mentality of the common objective in our studies has become clear. Once everyone completes their delegated topic, the group comes together, formats, adds suggestions, and review each area of focus. Then we are able to expand on the ideas with a rough draft and later form what is to be presented. Reflection Rubric: Fully describe group reflection: how we got to know each other as a group; what processes we used to develop group presentation, etc. Decision Making Decision-making is one of the most important aspects of any organisation in order to develop a developmental strategy for businesses to thrive and provide adequate support in business opportunities. Decision-making helps an organisation to grow prominently as well as to improve its structural operation. The decision-making process is an extremely essential part of any organisation in order to execute its basic operations and decide the best available opportunities for the organisation to carry on its business in the respective operating industry. There are seven major steps involved in decision making for any organisation. These steps are as follows: 1. Identification of the decision - As stated above, our initial process in tackling the problem was to identify what job would be best for Maria given the circumstances. Editor Markup: On Text Predictions: On 1. Identification of the decision - As stated above, our initial process in tackling the problem was to identify what job would be best for Maria given the circumstances. Which job fits Maria's study qualifications best? Does she want to have a job that pays more than minimum wage, but has long hours? Does she want to work fewer hours and have more personal life flexibility? There are just a few of the questions Maria is facing. 2. Gathering relevant information We were given brief descriptions of Marias options and situation. Which is a job that would best serve her short-term and long-term goals. Three options were, Call center agent, Door to Door Sale (Seafood & Meat product) or General Office assistant. 3. Identification of alternatives - We had to choose between the door-to-door sale and the call center job. To pursue Marias short-term goal, call center was quite appropriate as the compensation was as per minimum wage and she could help her mother's treatment, work hours were flexible, which Maria could have utilized for learning new skills to facilitate her future career but it has a loud environment which she doesn't seem to be fond to, on the other hand, Door to door sale was a career which Maria wanted to pursue in the long- term goal, it had Entrepreneural disposition and career advancement opportunities which were as per Marias liking, it also has a positive workplace environment which she feels encouraged and motivated. 4. Weighing the evidence - Maria wants have the flexibility to be able to spend time with her mother, but also generate an income to help her support both her and her mother. This is a tough decision that Maria is going to have to make but comparing all her options and Editor Markup: On Text Predictions: On ) that will suit her best. 5. Choosing the best alternative - Choosing the best alternative for Maria, we were stuck between the call center job and the door-to-door sale, given the situation and Marias circumstances. We chose the door to door sale as we believe it would benefit her in both short-term and long-term goal, as she would be able closer to her mother whilst being able to practice and learn more about Entrepreneural skills with the door to door sale. 6. Taking action - Actions that we took to finalize our decisions were to take some positive action by beginning to implement the alternative which is the Door-to-Door sale. 7. Reviewing the decision and consequences - In our final approach to our project, we decided to move forward with the Door-to-door sale, as the job may be based on commission, we think that this would benefit Maria to work on her social skills to be a successful entrepreneur just like the lady who interviewed her. Only consequence in choosing this job is in a sales role position being shy and lacking the ability to be outgoing will be difficult in being successful and will raise many challenges. Following the above approach, the decision-making can provide an adequate level of support to a business to make an extensive level of advancement in its operational condition. Following these steps ensures that a decision is correctly implemented into the system, providing a better approach to decision making in order to improve the availability of opportunities for the brand to implement a framework of steps for improving decision making and provide the right way of operation. Text Predictions: On Editor Markup: On