Please read Marie v. Am. Red Cross case and then answer those 3 questions:

1. Though simply identifying workers as volunteers is insufficient to prevent title VII application, does the name by which an employer calls its workers matter at all? In other words, does it matter at all whether the employer calls its workers volunteers or employees, or is it completely irrelevant?
2. Which test did the court apply to determine whether the Sisters were employees and thereby merit the protections of employment discrimination laws?
3. Can you think of any public policy reasons why Title VII should be interpreted or amended to require employers to consider some or all volunteer workers as employees?