**PLEASE SET-UP THE ANSWER SIMILAR TO HOW I HAVE SETUP THE QUESTION**

I THANK YOU VERY MUCH IN ADVANCE :)

Rachel entered into a contract to purchase a 2004 Dodge from Hanna, who lived in the neighboring apartment. When a dispute arose over the terms of the contract, Hanna argued that, because neither she nor Rachel was a merchant, the dispute should be decided under general principles of common law. Rachel, on the other hand, argued that Hanna was legally considered to be a merchant because she sold the car for profit and that, consequently, the sale was governed by the Uniform Commercial Code. Who is correct? Explain.

• The case is determined usingIRAC. The matter of the case is as follows:

1. Theissue is:
2. Therule of law for this case is
   • It is defined as:
3. Ananalysis of the case
   • The facts of the case are:
4. Aconclusion of the case states:
   • Based on the facts of the case -