PLEASE WRTE 11 CONCLUSONS :AND Queston Conclusions:

CASE-1 (Engineer's explanation to the public) : A major media organization visited the construction of the Bosphorus bridge and asked you to comment on the cause and cost of the delays, the numerous work accidents that have occurred, and the future of the project. For this, it will pay you a certain amount. You made a general report by making a daily visit to the construction site, there are additional tests required to take into account the problems that may arise in the future, you also foresee other similar technical measures. Based on the report you wrote, the press organization prepared a series of articles, accusing the engineers working in the construction, the subcontractor itself, and even allegations of corruption. He has publicly stated that this project will be unsafe in the future. As it is a public institution, an investigation has been launched for the relevant persons on this series of articles, and they have invited you to testify. You also reported that you were reporting on technical issues and not on such claims; You didn't say that the project will not be safe in the future.

QUESTION : Would you apply to the press ethics institution for this behavior and demand that an investigation be launched against the press organization?

NSPE Code Of Ethics References: Section 1.6: Conduct themselves honorably, responsibly, ethically, and lawfully so as to enhance the honor, reputation, and usefulness of the profession. Section 2.3.a : Engineers shall be objective and truthful in professional reports, statements, or testimony. They shall include all relevant and pertinent information in such reports, statements, or testimony, which should bear the date indicating when it was current. Section 2.4.a : Engineers shall disclose all known or potential conflicts of interest that could influence or appear to influence their judgment or the quality of their services. Section 3.3 : Engineers shall avoid all conduct or practice that deceives the public

Discussion : An engineer should be honest and reliable in his work. If he sees an irregularity in his workplace, he should report it to the relevant institutions. It is the engineer's duty to do this due to engineering ethics. He should also make a public statement when he sees such a situation. As it says in a section of engineering ethics engineers shall be objective and truthful in professional reports, statements, or testimony. They shall include all relevant and pertinent information in such reports, statements, or testimony, which should bear the date indicating when it was current. A similar example to this example was experienced in real life. An engineer working in France. He observes that the company he works for is making irregularities in his work. The engineer thinks that this situation is wrong and prepares an observation report. And by forwarding this report it has prepared to the higher institutions, it ensures the closure of the workplace.