pls answer

Globalization: is it a force for good or for bad? Impreved income? trade an shamd anceg evecyute in the creatro An rxanple of thit it Chas, whirn that wiztries which open their doons te ward trale tend se becone weathist Howerre, these iocts of figure inight not be gring a troe picture. They az averape' ffeuses, and deripate the fact that ther has been a intetantiel incrous in income for a More importh, mese reperts Supporter of free triste poiat oat that thene in another direct beacit to be gained exanpie, Countriet witich potsuce and ecpart catiee inport the paciapong for it a ruch as coffee, and richer councries wilch peodace asd export riatiflastumt gondt nuch as packaging materials. Parchetmote, it it the niser countrist which ceatrul the low priee asd to lay inareafactured goodn at a =flated price. Indestrial development mathet. Oa the other hand, thoue countriet which cotcieue to twppon all their indestres usully do net develop etpertise in aty ore Coeacgurtethg these countries do not Ind a metisnal groduct IGKTh). induery. Coeftriet which chly bocas on ene of twa main indurnies are forsed to inport have a tendency ta acquttidate buge telts. This debute wal undoubtedy cantizae fer asane tine Mownere, it woald teed that at better balance between toe trade asd falr bade is the aaswer ta the feitirmi of globulization. Aspect 1: For: Against. Aspect 2: For: Against Aspect 3: For: Against Discussion/Author's opinien