Quality level	70.00%		Quality level	70.00%
	Working Days	5		Working Days	5
	Shifts	3		Shifts	3
	Length of shift (hours)	8		Length of shift (hours)	8
	Operators per shift	5		Operators	5
	Planned downtime per shift (minutes)	45		Planned downtime per shift (minutes)	45
	Cycle Time of the resource activity (sec)	5		Cycle Time of the resource activity (sec)	5
	Demand for finished goods per week	52200		Demand for finished goods per week	52200
	Demand for finished goods per day	10440		Demand for finished goods per day	10440
	Budgeted / Target PPH	35		Budgeted / Target PPH	35
	Total Parts Produced all shifts	1100		Total Parts Produced All shifts	11000
	Length of shift (minutes)	480
	Length of shift (seconds)	28800		Answer the following:
	Planned downtime per shift (seconds)	2700		Are you meeting takt time :
	Available time per shift (seconds)	26100		Are you meeting / exceeding productivity target?
	Available time per shift (hours)	7.25		Are you generating FG inventory?
	Available Seconds per Day	78300		Number of operators per shift needed to meet or exceed target PPH (same quality)
	Number of Parts to be scheduled per day (based on yield loss)	14914		Can Increasing Quality to 100% meet target PPH without changing original number of operators?
	After Quality Losses	10440
	Defects	4474
	Net Effective Cycle Time	7.14
	Takt Time (sec)	7.50
	Productivity - Parts Per Person per hour (PPH) - based on quality rate	2.3601533

the questions are listed below.

1). are you meeting takt time?

2). are you meeting/exceeding productivity target?

3). are you generating FG inventory?

4). Number of operations per shift needed to meet or exceed target PPH (same quailty)

5). can increasing quality to hundred percent meet target PPH without changing original number of operations?

the questions are listed below.

1). are you meeting takt time?

2). are you meeting/exceeding productivity target?

3). are you generating FG inventory?

4). Number of operations per shift needed to meet or exceed target PPH (same quailty)

5). can increasing quality to hundred percent meet target PPH without changing original number of operations?