Question $78(1\mathrm{.}25$ points$)$

In Arizona, there is a statute that makes it a crime to shoot an elk outside the area specified by a hunter's permit. Marco is hunting and shoots an elk outside of the area specified by his permit.

If Marco was unaware of the statute, he cannot be held criminally liable.

Marcus can be convicted of the crime regardless of his intent or knowledge of the law if it is a strict liability statute.

If Marcus did not intend to break the law, under the doctrine of mens rea, he cannot be convicted.

None of the above are true.