Read Case Study that is provided below. In this case, the research firm suggested marketing Kolanders Creamy. Think about their decision and write down your own opinions. You need to provide evidence and logics to your answer. You should add your references, if you have any.

New England Soup Company manufactured Kolanders Clam Chouder in the Boston market in the late 1970s which they sold to both consumers and institutions. Two new competitors entered the market which led to a gradual decline in Kolanders sales and share of the clam chowder market. Consumers of Cape Cod and Fishermans Delight, the new competitors, claimed that focus group interviews showed consumers preference of the new brands because they were thicker and creamier. New England Soup Company, therefore, commissioned a taste test assessing the three current brands on the market plus a Kolanders Creamy and a Kolanders Extra-Creamy version. The taste test was conducted scientifically. 200 respondents were randomly selected from the Boston market and given multiple tastes of each of the five chowders. Each respondent ranked the chowders from most liked (rank=1) to least liked (rank=5). On the next page is a table of 20 respondents selected because they are perfectly representative of the 200 respondents in the sample. The research firm suggested marketing Kolanders Creamy because of its higher average rank and because of a trend in taste preferences toward creamier chowders.

Do you agree or disagree based on the following assumptions, and why? i. Due to production constraint, New England Soup Company can produce only one of the two new chowders they are testing. ii. The data in the table are perfectly representative of the Boston market. iii. The Chowder will be marketed only within the Boston market.