Read Jennings $(10$th ed$.)$ Case $3\mathrm{.}18$: Herman Miller and its Rain Forest Chairs $($pp$.220-223)$; then, answer the following questions:$1.$ Evaluate Foleys decision on changing the Eames chair woods. Consider the moral standards at issue for various stakeholders$\mathrm{.}2.$ Is it troublesome that Millers profits were off when Foley made the decision?$3.$ Is Herman Miller bluffing with green marketing? Would Albert Carr $($Reading $2\mathrm{.}3)$ support Herman Millers actions for different reasons? Explain$\mathrm{.}4.$ Why would Herman Miller decide to buy equipment that exceeded the $1990$ Clean Air Act standards when it would not be needed in three years?$5.$ During $20082012,$ Herman Miller went through a slump in sales and earnings but retained its sustainability focus. Despite advice from shareholders and experts, the company refused to cut costs by eliminating some of its green programs. Did the sustainability focus help the company with its sales and profits. Bibligrafy please