Real World Scenario: Imagine a situation where a technologically advanced nation$-$state, known for its cyber capabilities, seeks to gain a significant information advantage over a coalition of friendly countries. This nation$-$state is attempting to penetrate the networks of these friendly countries to collect critical information about their interests, future plans, technical data, and intentions. These activities are aimed at enabling the adversary to stay ahead in geopolitical negotiations and strategic decision$-$making.

Moreover, in a volatile region, a large technologic peer$-$competitor is undermining the efforts of the United States and its coalition partners to provide stability and support to a host nation. This host nation has requested assistance to counteract actions taken by a hostile neighboring country. The adversary is leveraging a combination of cyber and physical tactics to disrupt critical services such as water and electrical infrastructure, exacerbating the turmoil in the region.

As if these challenges weren't complex enough, a new crisis emerges within the combatant commander's area of responsibility. This additional threat requires immediate attention and strategic allocation of resources. Amidst these evolving challenges, the need to balance day$-$to$-$day operations with crisis response becomes paramount. The commander must assess priorities, intent, and available resources to effectively address each emerging crisis while ensuring that the ongoing operations continue seamlessly.

Now answer the Question $1$ to $5.$

What is the primary objective of a technologically advanced nation$-$state attempting to penetrate friendly networks?