Review the resources regarding the Liebeck v. McDonald's case. Think about what you learned about torts in this unit. If you were a member of the jury, would you have decided on Liebeck's or McDonald's? Be sure to support your position with citations to authority and the elements of negligence.

In response to your peers, consider your peers' responses. If they disagree with your answer, consider the factual assumptions they have made, which form the foundation of their opinion. Can you challenge those assumptions while furthering your discussion? If your responses are similar, consider posing a hypothetical question to test your peer's conclusions.

 Whether you are an attorney arguing in court or a business stakeholder pitching to shareholders or a potential client, adding support for your argument from appropriate resources strengthens your content. For this discussion board, be sure to include a citation to a proper source supporting your point. (HINT: Your textbook is a great source!)

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Review of Liebeck v McDonalds Case The Liebeck v McDonalds case also known as the McDonalds coffee case is a wellknown example of a personal injury lawsuit that focused on the issue of product liabili... View the full answer