Select the case name that corresponds with each description below. At least one case name will be unused. When there is an existing contract, plaintiff cannot claim recovery under quasi-contract-must apply terms of contract The following "detriments" to members, considered together, provide valid consideration to form a contract: requirement to provide personal information; having to wait in line for a chance to win a prize; having to present card to attendant in order to try to win a prize, which permits the company to gather info about consumer habits; court also mentioned that company did not offer the membership just to be nice, but to generate business for itself (a benefit for the company) Plaintiffs may justifiably rely on positive assertions of fact without independent investigation since nothing in the transaction suggested anything that would "serve as a warning" that they were being deceived Court applied a two-step analysis of necessities: (1) Is the subject (in this case, housing) generally a necessity? (2) Is the subject a necessity to the minor in question? Upon assignment of a right, the assignor's interest in that right is extinguished; however, upon the delegation of a contractual duty, the delegating party remains liable under the contract unless the contract provides otherwise or there is a novation