Question: SHRM Case: Selection Part 2B Non-compensatory strategy Based on your knowledge and experience with bank tellers, create a cutoff for each of the six factors
SHRM Case: Selection Part 2B
- Non-compensatory strategy
- Based on your knowledge and experience with bank tellers, create a cutoff for each of the six factors in the table below.
|
| Cutoff for each assessment |
| Education | The applicant must have at least a high school diploma or GED. |
| Work experience |
|
| Math skills |
|
| Verification knowledge |
|
| Interpersonal skills |
|
| Work motivation |
|
- Non-compensatory Multiple Cutoff
Apply your cutoffs listed in the table above to the four applicants.
- Whch applcant(s) remans?
- If no applicant met all of the cutoffs, would you rather lower the cutoffs or restart the recruiting process? Why?
- If many applicants exceed the cutoffs, would you rather increase the cutoff levels, hire all remaining applicants (if possible) or take a compensatory approach for those that exceeded all of the cutoffs? Why?
- Non-compensatory strategy:
Multiple hurdle system
|
| Rejected applicant (name) |
| Hurdle 1: Education | None, all applicants have at least high school diploma or GED. |
| Hurdle 2: |
|
| Hurdle 3: |
|
| Hurdle 4: |
|
| Hurdle 5: |
|
| Hurdle 6: |
|
- At the end of hurdle 6, which applicant(s) remained?
- What would you recommend if you had no remaining applicants or several applicants remaining?
- Do you prefer this method over the multiple cutoff method? Why or why not?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
