State A and State B have both accepted the contentious jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice using Article 36(2) optional clause declarations. State A’s declaration limits the jurisdiction of the ICJ to matters involving border disputes and diplomatic immunity. State B’s declaration limits the jurisdiction of the ICJ to matters involving border disputes and the interpretation of treaties. the ICJ would have jurisdiction as to what types of disputes between State A and State B? Why?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

In this scenario State A and State B have both accepted the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice ICJ through the Article 362 optional cl... View the full answer