Students are required to write a summary (2-3 pages) and critiques for one of the reading assignments prior to each class meeting. These assignments are designed to orient students to the topics presented and to encourage students to think critically about the material that will be presented in class. Students will receive points if they directly address the assignments and pose a critical aspect of the reading assignment (i.e., antithetical to what is stated in the assigned readings or covered in class). Questions may be posted for specific readings to give students an idea of topics to address.

Rummler & Brache (2013)

1. Describe the Job/Performer map. Ch. 5, Page 62-63
2. What are Job Goals? Is there a job goal you have that can be improved? CH. 5, Page 65-66
3. What are the Seven Deadly Sins and how to improve them? Ch. 11, Page 174-181
4. What are the two views of Performance Management? Ch. 15, Page 245-247
5. What is the "vacuum" view of performance? Ch. 15, Page 251-253

REFERENCE

Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (2012).Improving performance: how to manage the white space on the organization chart, third edition (3rd ed.). Wiley.

OBM Reading Assignment Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Summary of Key Concepts

5 pts Full Marks Provides a thorough, accurate summary of the key concepts from the reading, demonstrating a deep understanding of the material.

2.5 pts Half Marks Covers some key concepts but with significant omissions or misunderstandings.

0 pts No Marks No summary provided or the summary is wholly inaccurate.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis

7 pts Full Marks Offers a sophisticated critique, effectively identifying and discussing multiple critical aspects, including points antithetical to the reading.

3.5 pts Half Marks Includes a critique with some depth, but may miss some critical aspects or the antithetical point is weakly argued.

0 pts No Marks No critique provided or the critique is wholly irrelevant.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Integration with Class Topics

4 pts Full Marks Insightfully integrates the reading with topics covered in class, showing clear connections and relevance.

2 pts Half Marks Attempts to connect with class topics but the integration is unclear or weak.

0 pts No Marks No connection made to class topics.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clarity and Organization

2 pts Full Marks Writing is clear, well-organized, and easy to follow. Each section is logically structured and transitions smoothly.

1 pts Half Marks Writing is generally clear, but some areas may lack organization or coherence.

0 pts No Marks Writing is unclear and poorly organized, making it difficult to follow.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar and APA Style

2 pts Full Marks No grammatical errors, and the paper follows APA style perfectly.

1 pts Half Marks A few minor grammatical errors and/or APA style issues.

0 pts No Marks Frequent grammatical errors and/or significant issues with APA style.

2 pts