The public image of business in the latter part of the nineteenth century was hardly flattering...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
The public image of business in the latter part of the nineteenth century was hardly flattering The adventures of so-called "Robber Barons" constantly made the headlines and their exploits matched those of their contemporaries in the Wild West. For ex- ample, J. P. Morgan hired an army of toughs to literally battle for a section of rail- road near Binghamton, New York. And business leaders often expressed their con- tempt for the public interest, exemplified by such infamous comments as W. H. Vanderbilt's "the public be damned" and J. P. Morgan's "lowe the public nothing." Recent research suggests that these individuals were probably not the villains they were portrayed to be, though it is undeniable that they wielded enormous power. It was precisely during the era of these powerful business leaders that Harold Cole founded Fort Greenwold (FG), a firm that is currently one of the largest producers of paper and pulp with annual sales of $3.5 billion. Cole located his first plant in a rural town in New England, partly to create jobs for the many un- employed workers in the area. "Having a heart does not mean you can't make a buck." Harold was fond of saying. The firm has always been active in the af- fairs of the community and donates generously to local civic and charitable or ganizations. It also takes special pride in promoting a family atmosphere among its employees. Personnel experts believe that these policies are largely responsi- ble for the enviable productivity record of FG's workers. For its first 80 years FG had an impressive record of growth in earnings and sales. But as the company grew, the willingness of top-level management to de- centralize and delegate authority did not. The company stagnated until the ap- pointment of Andy Kurzer as chairman eight years ago in 1988 Kurzer was shocked at the "nickel-and-dime stuff" that reached corporate headquarters, and he moved quickly to decentralize authority. One major change involved the company's capital budgeting procedures. FC actually had no formal mecha- nism for capital projects Kurzer changed this and set up a six-person expendi- tures committee (EC) that would decide projects costing more than $200,000. Smaller expenditures would be decided at the regional and local levels. Ooredoo PART V CAPITAL BUDGETING 11:30 AM euruni.online @ 55% At present (1996) the EC is considering two alternatives for achieving a much-needed increase in the firm's production capacity. One option involves modernizing an existing mill in Lees Point, North Carolina. If the plant is not renovated in the near future, production would drop to 600 tons per day and the yearly cash flow would be $11,422.320. (See Exhibit 1 for more complete infor- mation). The other alternative is to build a new mill at Midtown, North Carolina, which is 15 miles from Lees Point. Barbara Wadkins, a member of the EC, was responsible for estimating the cost and yearly cash flows from building the new paper mill at Midtown. She calculated the cost to be 5618.8 million net of any tax considerations and in- cluding working capital, and estimated the yearly after-tax cash flow to be $107,728,000. Exhibit 2 presents the information used to determine these fig- ures. All committee members agree that these numbers are "quite reason- able." CONTROVERSY The figures on modernizing the existing facility at Lees Point are more con- troversial, however. Information on this project was originally sent by the management of the Lees Point plant and is also presented in Exhibit 2. The controversy centers on the estimated tonnage per day of the plant and its per- unit variable cost. Wadkins politely pointed out that it would be "extremely difficult for an old facility like the one at Lees Point to achieve output of 1,600 tons per day." In contrast to Wadkins's mild reaction was Kurzer's angry re- sponse. "You can forget it! I'll be the NBA's MVP before that plant puts out that tonnage!" Everyone on the EC knew what the problem was. Management is from Lees Point and is worried that a new facility will reduce jobs. "I don't know why I got so angry. I should expect an estimate like this," said Kurzer. After much discus- sion the committee unanimously agreed that 1,200 tons per day was much more accurate and, if anything, a bit optimistic. It was also decided that a per-unit variable cost of $282.1 per ton was appropriate instead of the original figure of $263.9 per ton. With these changes the yearly cash flow after taxes was estimated to be $40,634,680; this was considerably lower than the projection of $61,863,160 based on the figures sent by Lees Point management. MORE CONTROVERSY Both projects are assumed to last 20 years. This is a relatively long time horizon for a capital budgeting project, but the company feels a paper mill is unlikely to become technologically obsolete since paper production techniques have changed very little in the last century. At least one EC member, however, thinks Ooredoo 11:30 AM euruni.online @ 55% CASE 20 FORT GREENWOLD 125 that a 20-year period is too long for the "modernize-the-old" option. Past expe- rience, he argues, indicates that revitalizing an existing facility will rarely extend its life that much, and 15 years seems more probable. If so, he wonders if "we aren't being extremely charitable to the Lees Point plant. By my calculations, as- suming a 20-year time horizon for this project adds $40,634,680 times 5 or $203,173,400 to the total yearly cash flows. That's some largesse!" The rest of the committee concedes that 20 years may be a bit long, but decides to retain this time period as a working hypothesis. EMPLOYEE CONCERNS Some EC members are worried about the impact on employee morale if the fac- tory is relocated. "Apparently," says Wadkins, "there is considerable opposition to closing down the old factory, judging from the inaccurate figures we re- ceived." It is noted, however, that the move will "most certainly" not cost any- one a job, but will, in fact, create new positions, including some relatively high- paying managerial ones. Nonetheless, it was obvious that the proposed relocation would impose costs on the employees. Many would either have to re- locate to Midtown or face a 30-mile round trip daily commute. Wadkins won- dered if it "was fair and appropriate" to ask the employees to bear such costs, especially in light of the remarkable loyalty the Lees Point employees had shown to the company. She notes that a large proportion of the employees have worked for FG for more than 10 years. "One thing is clear," remarks a subdued Kurzer. "If we choose to relocate the plant, it is important that it does not appear to be some type of ivory-tower de- cision that would be inconsistent with the management philosophy we've pro- moted all these years. Barbara, I am sensitive to the issues you bring up. Employee morale and employee loyalty are very important considerations. Maybe we could work something out-you know, like some type of moving al- lowance." Kurzer also reminded the committee that Midtown was the closest suitable site to Lees Point should the company move. QUESTIONS 1. (a) Calculate the NPV of modernizing the existing paper mill. (b) Calculate the NPV of building a new paper mill. 2. (a) Calculate the IRR of each investment. (b) Calculate the payback of each. 3. (a) Do the NPV and IRR methods give the same accept/reject signals? (b) Explain why the NPV and IRR methods can give divergent signals when evaluating mutually exclusive alternatives. CAPITAL BUDGETING 4. Suppose that the appropriate life of a modernized factory is 15 instead of 20 years. Evaluate the argument that "assuming a 20-year time horizon for this project adds $40,634,680 times 5 or $203,173,400 to the yearly cash flows." 5. Based on your calculations in the previous questions and information in the case, what decision do you recommend? Justify your choice. 6. (a) Building a new mill requires $464.1 million more than modernizing the old mill but will generate an extra $67,093,320 in yearly cash flow. Calculate the IRR on this incremental expenditure. Compare your an- swer to the 12 percent required return. (b) Based on your answer in part (a), suggest a decision rule for the IRR in evaluating mutually exclusive alternatives with different initial costs. The public image of business in the latter part of the nineteenth century was hardly flattering The adventures of so-called "Robber Barons" constantly made the headlines and their exploits matched those of their contemporaries in the Wild West. For ex- ample, J. P. Morgan hired an army of toughs to literally battle for a section of rail- road near Binghamton, New York. And business leaders often expressed their con- tempt for the public interest, exemplified by such infamous comments as W. H. Vanderbilt's "the public be damned" and J. P. Morgan's "lowe the public nothing." Recent research suggests that these individuals were probably not the villains they were portrayed to be, though it is undeniable that they wielded enormous power. It was precisely during the era of these powerful business leaders that Harold Cole founded Fort Greenwold (FG), a firm that is currently one of the largest producers of paper and pulp with annual sales of $3.5 billion. Cole located his first plant in a rural town in New England, partly to create jobs for the many un- employed workers in the area. "Having a heart does not mean you can't make a buck." Harold was fond of saying. The firm has always been active in the af- fairs of the community and donates generously to local civic and charitable or ganizations. It also takes special pride in promoting a family atmosphere among its employees. Personnel experts believe that these policies are largely responsi- ble for the enviable productivity record of FG's workers. For its first 80 years FG had an impressive record of growth in earnings and sales. But as the company grew, the willingness of top-level management to de- centralize and delegate authority did not. The company stagnated until the ap- pointment of Andy Kurzer as chairman eight years ago in 1988 Kurzer was shocked at the "nickel-and-dime stuff" that reached corporate headquarters, and he moved quickly to decentralize authority. One major change involved the company's capital budgeting procedures. FC actually had no formal mecha- nism for capital projects Kurzer changed this and set up a six-person expendi- tures committee (EC) that would decide projects costing more than $200,000. Smaller expenditures would be decided at the regional and local levels. Ooredoo PART V CAPITAL BUDGETING 11:30 AM euruni.online @ 55% At present (1996) the EC is considering two alternatives for achieving a much-needed increase in the firm's production capacity. One option involves modernizing an existing mill in Lees Point, North Carolina. If the plant is not renovated in the near future, production would drop to 600 tons per day and the yearly cash flow would be $11,422.320. (See Exhibit 1 for more complete infor- mation). The other alternative is to build a new mill at Midtown, North Carolina, which is 15 miles from Lees Point. Barbara Wadkins, a member of the EC, was responsible for estimating the cost and yearly cash flows from building the new paper mill at Midtown. She calculated the cost to be 5618.8 million net of any tax considerations and in- cluding working capital, and estimated the yearly after-tax cash flow to be $107,728,000. Exhibit 2 presents the information used to determine these fig- ures. All committee members agree that these numbers are "quite reason- able." CONTROVERSY The figures on modernizing the existing facility at Lees Point are more con- troversial, however. Information on this project was originally sent by the management of the Lees Point plant and is also presented in Exhibit 2. The controversy centers on the estimated tonnage per day of the plant and its per- unit variable cost. Wadkins politely pointed out that it would be "extremely difficult for an old facility like the one at Lees Point to achieve output of 1,600 tons per day." In contrast to Wadkins's mild reaction was Kurzer's angry re- sponse. "You can forget it! I'll be the NBA's MVP before that plant puts out that tonnage!" Everyone on the EC knew what the problem was. Management is from Lees Point and is worried that a new facility will reduce jobs. "I don't know why I got so angry. I should expect an estimate like this," said Kurzer. After much discus- sion the committee unanimously agreed that 1,200 tons per day was much more accurate and, if anything, a bit optimistic. It was also decided that a per-unit variable cost of $282.1 per ton was appropriate instead of the original figure of $263.9 per ton. With these changes the yearly cash flow after taxes was estimated to be $40,634,680; this was considerably lower than the projection of $61,863,160 based on the figures sent by Lees Point management. MORE CONTROVERSY Both projects are assumed to last 20 years. This is a relatively long time horizon for a capital budgeting project, but the company feels a paper mill is unlikely to become technologically obsolete since paper production techniques have changed very little in the last century. At least one EC member, however, thinks Ooredoo 11:30 AM euruni.online @ 55% CASE 20 FORT GREENWOLD 125 that a 20-year period is too long for the "modernize-the-old" option. Past expe- rience, he argues, indicates that revitalizing an existing facility will rarely extend its life that much, and 15 years seems more probable. If so, he wonders if "we aren't being extremely charitable to the Lees Point plant. By my calculations, as- suming a 20-year time horizon for this project adds $40,634,680 times 5 or $203,173,400 to the total yearly cash flows. That's some largesse!" The rest of the committee concedes that 20 years may be a bit long, but decides to retain this time period as a working hypothesis. EMPLOYEE CONCERNS Some EC members are worried about the impact on employee morale if the fac- tory is relocated. "Apparently," says Wadkins, "there is considerable opposition to closing down the old factory, judging from the inaccurate figures we re- ceived." It is noted, however, that the move will "most certainly" not cost any- one a job, but will, in fact, create new positions, including some relatively high- paying managerial ones. Nonetheless, it was obvious that the proposed relocation would impose costs on the employees. Many would either have to re- locate to Midtown or face a 30-mile round trip daily commute. Wadkins won- dered if it "was fair and appropriate" to ask the employees to bear such costs, especially in light of the remarkable loyalty the Lees Point employees had shown to the company. She notes that a large proportion of the employees have worked for FG for more than 10 years. "One thing is clear," remarks a subdued Kurzer. "If we choose to relocate the plant, it is important that it does not appear to be some type of ivory-tower de- cision that would be inconsistent with the management philosophy we've pro- moted all these years. Barbara, I am sensitive to the issues you bring up. Employee morale and employee loyalty are very important considerations. Maybe we could work something out-you know, like some type of moving al- lowance." Kurzer also reminded the committee that Midtown was the closest suitable site to Lees Point should the company move. QUESTIONS 1. (a) Calculate the NPV of modernizing the existing paper mill. (b) Calculate the NPV of building a new paper mill. 2. (a) Calculate the IRR of each investment. (b) Calculate the payback of each. 3. (a) Do the NPV and IRR methods give the same accept/reject signals? (b) Explain why the NPV and IRR methods can give divergent signals when evaluating mutually exclusive alternatives. CAPITAL BUDGETING 4. Suppose that the appropriate life of a modernized factory is 15 instead of 20 years. Evaluate the argument that "assuming a 20-year time horizon for this project adds $40,634,680 times 5 or $203,173,400 to the yearly cash flows." 5. Based on your calculations in the previous questions and information in the case, what decision do you recommend? Justify your choice. 6. (a) Building a new mill requires $464.1 million more than modernizing the old mill but will generate an extra $67,093,320 in yearly cash flow. Calculate the IRR on this incremental expenditure. Compare your an- swer to the 12 percent required return. (b) Based on your answer in part (a), suggest a decision rule for the IRR in evaluating mutually exclusive alternatives with different initial costs.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
1 a To calculate the Net Present Value NPV of modernizing the existing paper mill we need to discount the yearly cash flows from the project and subtract the initial investment Given that the yearly c... View the full answer
Related Book For
Taxes and Business Strategy A Planning Approach
ISBN: 9780132752671
5th edition
Authors: Myron Scholes, Mark Wolfson, Merle Erickson, Michelle Hanlon
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
A project that cost $80000 with a useful life of 5 years is being considered. Straight-line depreciation is being used and salvage value is $5000. The project will generate annual revenues of $21375....
-
Suppose you prefer working 40 hours per week to 20 hours, and prefer working 32hours per week to either 20 or 40 hours. However, you are forced to work either 20hours or 40 hours per week. Is your...
-
Suppose that taxable bonds maturing in 5 years yield 10% per year before tax. a. What risk adjusted appreciation rate on a non dividend paying common stock is required for the following taxpayers to...
-
1. What is the present value (PV") of an offer of $15,000 two years from now if the Opportunity Cost of Capital (OCC) is $12% per annum? 2. What is the PV of an offer to receive $12,000 three years...
-
Media Marketing of Atlanta, Georgia, offers a three-day accommodation coupon for a Hilton Head resort in South Carolina at a promotion price of C$316. If the exchange rate is C$1.02 per U.S. dollar,...
-
Barley, Inc., wants a projection of cash receipts and cash payments for the month of November. On November 28, a note will be payable in the amount of $102,250, including interest. The cash balance...
-
Refer to the information in QS 19-16. The company sells its product for $50 per unit. Due to new regulations, the company must now incur $2 per unit of hazardous waste disposal costs and $8,500 per...
-
The income statement of Supplements Plus, Inc. follows: Additional data follow: a. Acquisition of plant assets is $121,000. Of this amount, $104,000 is paid in cash and $17,000 by signing a note...
-
A firm just paid an annual dividend of $3.50 per share. Dividends are expected to grow at 5% per year. If the discount rate for this firm is 12%, how much is a share of this firm worth?Group of...
-
Walgreen Company is a well-known drugstore chain. A condensed balance sheet for August 31, 2011, follows ($ in millions): Use a format similar to Exhibit to analyze the following transactions for the...
-
Remove the entire column prod_id from the movie table: First, drop the foreign key constraint from the movie table. You can use the command SHOW CREATE TABLE movie; to see the name of the foreign key...
-
The first line of the sixth paragraph states that the Indian central bank has tried to counter the inflationary pressures from expanding the money supply by "raising the reserves [that banks] must...
-
solve the following 16) sin (tan- u) -1
-
solve the equation x
-
Memo 1: If we lower the price, do you think this is likely to lead to higher revenue, and how much potential revenue can we generate and how low should we go with our price? To estimate the price...
-
Gerry and Ruth grow turnips and potatoes. Does Gerry have a comparative advantage in producing turnips? explain why in detail
-
3-for-1 stock split. The current fair value is $13 per share. Indicate the financial impact on the financial statement items listed of each action under consideration (treat each possibility...
-
Identify the most stable compound:
-
Paula makes the following gifts in the current year: $ 20,000 to the United Way; $ 15,000 to her brother Skip, who is a compulsive gambler; $ 45,000 to her husband Larry, to fund a new boat; and $...
-
Suppose Congress was to reduce the top corporate tax rate, tc, to 30% from 35%. How would this affect the required pretax corporate return, R*c, calculated in the final line of Table 4.4? That is,...
-
Risk differences among assets mask the effects of differential taxation on returns. If we know the required after tax risk premiums on assets, how can we determine the effects of differential...
-
Find P 80 , the 80th percentile for the red blood cell counts of women.
-
Mensa International calls itself the international high IQ society, and it has more than 100,000 members. Mensa states that candidates for membership of Mensa must achieve a score at or above the...
-
A new integrated circuit board is being developed for use in computers. In the early stages of development, a lack of quality control results in a 0.2 probability that a manufactured integrated...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App