Test question:While Mark was on a wilderness fishing trip in canada, flood waters threatened his neighborhood. His neighbors hired a contractor to build a temporary levee and all the houses including marks were saved from certain water damage. Upon his return mark refused to pay his share of the contractors bill, claiming that he hadnt agreed to the work. Th most likely legal result would be :

a. Mark is right- his lack of agreement means there was no contract and he wont have to pay

b.Mark is right- his lack of agreement means there was no contract, but he will still have to pay because he would be unjustly enriched if he is not required to pay

c. Mark is wrong-under these circumstances his agreement wasnt necessary to form a contract and he will have to pay.

d. Mark is wrong- he is required to pay because it would be unethical for him not to pay his share of the cost