The argument being made is that the Triborough Amendment, part of New York's Taylor Law, serves as a stabilizing force for public sector unions by maintaining existing employment terms when contracts expire. This provision prevents strikes but also restricts the bargaining power of public employees, creating a balance between labor stability and the right to strike. The amendment is viewed as both a protective measure for workers' conditions and a limitation on their bargaining power, contributing to the debate on how to ensure fair labor negotiations and the vitality of public sector unions.Criteria for evaluating the argument:Stability: The amendment's role in preventing strikes and maintaining consistent employment terms.Bargaining Power: The impact on public employees' ability to negotiate new terms.Protection vs$.$ Limitation: The dual nature of the amendment as both a safeguard and a constraint.Context: The influence of broader anti$-$labor sentiments and legislative actions on the amendment's effectiveness.Do I agree? This is subjective and depends on one's perspective on labor rights and union power. Some may agree, valuing stability and protection, while others may disagree, prioritizing stronger bargaining power and the right to strike.