The following is modified from Financial Statements, T. Ittelson, 2009, ISBN: 978-1-60163-023-0. NPV and IRR measure two
Question:
The following is modified from "Financial Statements", T. Ittelson, 2009, ISBN: 978-1-60163-023-0.
NPV and IRR measure two different but complementary, aspects of capital use.
The two different methods of evaluating capital investments each have inherent
advantages and disadvantages.
Net Present Value (NPV) | Internal Rate of Return (IRR) | |
Advantages | NPV is a direct measure of value-added to the company from executing the project Comparing the value of alternative projects is easy with NPV analysis: just pick the project with the highest NPV over zero | IRR Is a popular capital budgeting tool because it show the efficiency of capital use in an easy-to-understand percent return format. Computing IRR is valid without having to estimate a discount rate |
Disadvantages | NPV requires an assumed input discount rate (capital cost plus risk premium, which may be difficult to estimate. | IRR computes only a percent return, not a value, and thus disregards project scale and is not a measure of ultimate worth to the company. IRR can make a small project appear more attractive than a large project. In fact, a very small project could have a very high IRR but also have a low and very unattractive NPV. IRR assume cash flow returns are invested at an often unrealistically high rate (the IRR). MIRR (modified internal rate of return) analysis solves this problem. |
From your readings and/or experience:
Question 1: Add to the advantages and disadvantages to the consideration of NPV for capital projects.
Question 2: Add to the advantages and disadvantages to the consideration of IRR for capital projects.
Income Tax Fundamentals 2013
ISBN: 9781285586618
31st Edition
Authors: Gerald E. Whittenburg, Martha Altus Buller, Steven L Gill